Very good, thanks.

Copyright violation. Reverted.

Reverted.

Reverted - copyright.

You are attracting attention due to copyright issues.

Copyright notice on the bottom right corner of the web page referred to ...

"All contents Copyright " .... Do you have permission to copy this???
Not listed on osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#New_South_Wales

Don't blame you for the confusion. If we had sanskrit or cyrillic we'd know know to spell things.

I'll fix it when I get back to it. I'm slowly working through an 'error' file from rendering an Australian map, Address errors were 3.3 Mb .. now down to 2.7 Mb most of them were capitation error that were easy and quick to fix. These types are messy and time consuming.

Hi,

Conflict of road names here

Toolebuc Road on the road itself
and
Tooleybuc Road on the farm addresses...

A google search has
Tooleybuc for Queensland
and
Toolebuc for NSW... sigh. Translations from Aborigine I assume.

Change these all to Tooleybuc ???

Hi,
Long time ago but these 'house numbers' would they not be 'addr:unit' sharing the same street and 'house number' for the Westminster Retirement Village ???

Hi
relation/16333552 (farmland) is not closed... so it is in error. Further it looks like it contains areas that are not farmland. In any case this needs looking at.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.93064&lat=-33.00035&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The road gets split where it changes speed limit, classification, surface and/or turn restrictions apply. Many roads are split into many segments. In this case there are 4 segments ... one is a bridge, one is a turn restriction and the other two are different classifications.

Consider Ryde Rd ... many different segments and not anything that combines them all.

Why make a relation for gladesville road??? The western section is not a classification of tertiary...

The relevant tags were on the individual ways ...

---------------
Hint
The DCS Imagery has better accuracy .. bing tends to be more upto date .. but may have offsets.

addr:postcode without a street, house number ...

The postcodes have been deleted entered by you in this vicinity. As have country, state etc ... These can be had by the data base users looking for 'is in' searches so don't bother adding data bloat.

I think I got them all ...
63 done
changeset/142252468
At least the ones you entered.. have check for any others .. found 93 others .. Spanish? mapper... corrected...

Trees don't have addresses...

2 relations for the bridge deleted. One old way made into the bridge and made into a simple closed way.

See man_made=bridge for correct bridge tagging.

Hi
Relation 16379431 - fairway, now only has one member with the role 'inner'. That makes no sense, you should look at this to fix it.

Hi
relation/16389568 deleted. building=yes;roof needed to be separated into one OSM entry for building=yes (I changed this to retail) and a separate building=roof with layer=1.

The guide is 'one feature = one OSM entry'.

Umm I don't think trees have addresses...

addr:housenumber are valid witha - for a range of numbers.
see osm.wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers

Warnings .. are not necessarily errors that need correction.

This is no longer 'planned'. Scrapped in the government budget of October 2022... some say it was an election promise...