Hi,
Welcome to OSM!
Thanks for the initial contribution. Looks like Maxar imagery is more upto date than Bing in this area.
You certainly have taken the bull by the horns! A few hints? Keep it simple, Do small bits at a time - map the building by itself ... then separately map a footpath.. this makes it easier to follow what the warning are talking about as you will have less of them to understand.

Hi
Way: 1148772981 looks to me to be more landuse=commercial rather than landuse=residential???

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!
Some hints?
Buildings are usually 'square' meaning their corners are right angles. When you make a 'square' building pressing the 'Q' key should 'square' up the building making it look better.
Bing imagery if fairly good.. but DCS imagery tends to have better accuracy and resolution.

Hi,
Error in relation 15526451
Way: 1149122465 cross itself - duplicated nodes... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.82254&lat=-33.88005&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Ill leave this alone so you can see it.

I have fixed it.
For how it was broken the route ways were not in sequence. See @Warin61/diary/45106

I keep an eye on 2 bus routes I entered. Because they may not have changed for some period of time does not mean they are 'unmaintained'.

Hi,

This has broken the bus route relation/3331347 No 711

Hi,
The relationship 15509013 Vibrance Studios is wrong - the inner way touches the outer. It would have been better left as it was -a simple way. Do you want me to fix this?

Hi
The community garden would include the veg etc plots???

The "name' Vegitables, Fruit ... well those are descriptions... see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Keep mapping.

Hi,
There is a problem with one of these houses... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.08833&lat=-33.99812&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The DCS Imagery gives better resolution than bing , and has better location accuracy too.

OK. I'll unname the track that the base map shows without a name.

I'll add the press reported name as 'loc_name=Clover Hill Trail' .. and call it 'good enough' :)

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

Muiltpolygons are one of the harder things to understand. The one you have made here is not correct. see relation/15479996.

The firest meber way/871161920 encompasses the whole lake the other ways simply duplicate segments of this way. Best to keep the map as simple as possible, that would be done bt tagging way/871161920 as a lake, then deleting the other member ways in the relation and then the relation it self. \
For more info on multipolygon relations read the OSM wiki osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Keep mapping .. lots to do.

I note that it has been 6 months since the introduction of the 'permission to use' this data on the Australian Data Catalog. Yet the 'permission' document remains missing. Suggest you spend time getting that done....

Hi,

Are you certain that this Rural Fire Brigade occupies both buildings?

Thanks.
I add the extras after the above message ..
I'll be checking the lot of NSW fire stations and brigades once I'm through doing this 'housekeeping' .. that will take a while. I'' make 2 lists of what OSM has and compare that with the official lists .. then I'll work on the discrepancies (both any missing and any extras).

Hi,
The DCS base map says that there are 2 Rural Fire Brigades here;
Oak Flats and Wollongong Headquarters...

But the DCS base map is confused - upto 4 Rural Fire Services here in this locality when zoomed out! So maybe these are in addition to your entries?????

Hi,
Bing shows water in Green Creek, where as in the DCS Imagery it looks bone dry. As it flows into a 'creek' then it cannot be a river? The problem is assign it as either a river or a stream ... after rain .. during flooding it would be a lake :) I'd stick with the name 'Creek' to suggest what the locals thought of it?

Good oh.

Dam! I missed that - just went straight to the long table under it . mutter mutter... !

Take your time, they have been unloved for a while. And yes, I approve of removing State Forests from National Parks - when the NPs are more upto date than the State Forests.

Hi,

These numbers you have added to th eend of the fire station names... they seem to be 'station numbers' and not part of the name? Possibly they would be better tagged as ref= x where x is the station number???
See https://www.fire.nsw.gov.au/station_list/