Beast? Should be 'Best'!

Hi,

The JOSM validator would have identified 'self crossing ways' as a warning .. these should be fixed before upload. I pick them up from an OSM QA tool, see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.38409&lat=-35.14381&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The errors are on ways 1096817765, 1096822238, 1096822235 and 1096822227. These have all been last edited by yourself. Would you mind fixing these errors? I believe we learn best by fixing our own errors.

Let me know if you need help.

Yet another self crossing way ...Way: 1094337103

Learn not to do this .. or you are going to leave many of them scattered around using maproulette.

No response.

Hi,

Building Way: 1096208655 crosses it self. This is an error you should fix. Beast imagery here is the DCS Imagery.

A gap in a route relation that is a few kilomerters long and there might be some chance of finding it. A gap in the India Pacific train line that is a few meters long .. no chance. What helped was the gap was used by a few routes.

Best? Contact the previous mappers.. note the 's'.. some are not interested in the route but make changes to the line that effects the route... I generally try to keep an eye on the sydney train routes - in particular the longer ones.

If you are going to come back and fix it your self .. I'd not make the gap, just leave it untill you can replace it. This would leave the route functional even if using a fictional section.

If you look at bing then you'd see that this is 2 houses .. not one.

Node: 10100956488 is a duplication of Node: 6684811067.

I'll leave this for you to look at ...

Hi
The RSL looks to have been sold ...
https://www.realestate.com.au/sold/property-house-sa-port+germein-134472910

Hi,
The basketball/tennis court ... the imagery only shows basketball so I have changed it.
If you are surveying it please say so in your source comment with the changeset?

Reverted.

The DCS Imagery in this area of the world is better than bing.

Please do not realign to bing existing OSM objects unless you have more information.

Hi,
Changing Way: 689401624 to only "fixme"="does not exist" has caused me some hours of work to find where train route relations have been broken .. train routs such as Perth to Sydney, Dubbo to Sydney ...

Me, quietly bashing head against wall...

A roof is always above ground, layer=-1 says it is below ground... Both roofs are now tagged as layer=1 i.e. above ground.

There is nothing dedicated.. at the moment I can see.

I'd use the description key for example description=Supports sports by provision of showers, changing rooms, meeting room and canteen. The club key is for clubs ... so that the wrong thing to do. There is a shower, dressing room and a canteen tag that could be used to indicate there presence, nothing for meeting rooms though.. at least on the wiki.. there is the use of meeting_room=yes .. 11 occurrences.

A 'roof' is always above ground...

Hi,
The building Way: 1080747306 on Kaleen Ground you have tagged as a club=sport, sport=soccer;cricket ... what is the name of the club?

Redfern Train Staion:

Train lines are at layer 0.

Platforms should be at the same layer.

The walk ways go over the train line .. so they should be at layer=1 - same as the road way and cycle way ...

I have attempted to change this to where it should be.

Hi

Building levels should be integer numbers not 'elevator'. There are at least 20 of these, I've only looked along the Richmond line .. I expect more of them with a complete search. ... I'll simply delete the lot?

Hi
wetland overlaps waterway ... which is it?

Ways 1030893405 & 1030893306...

Perfection is hard to achieve, and even harder to maintain!

As long as it is a reasonable representation of what is there I'd call it good.

Hi,
The relation/14652383 'Hire Depot' is not correct.

First the tag 'building=yes' says that the entire area is a building.

Second a multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. This feature does not require a relation; simply map the outside of the area and label that with the name, shop and possibly 'landuse=retail'

The layer key is used to indicate that something is physically higher or lower than something else... there is none of that here.

A comment: when you alter something look for the existence of the tag 'source=*' .. if you are using a different source .. simply delete the tag 'source=*'