Ar ... you used bing. We have more accurate data than that...

Hi,
This changeset was partially reverted to restore the shape of the Sydney Opera House, the change made the roof cross itself.

The changeset comment 'Sydney' is not very informative... what were you doing? And what is the source of the changes?
I note that there were changes to some administration boundaries ..

I have removed the bull (pun) ... they were on
node/9069893661/history

and

node/9109512061/history

Not certain why they were there ... vicious large dog? Or maybe I have it wrong.. but if you do remember I'd be interested..

I keep using that tool to spot my errors .. 4 of them yesterday ... mutter mutter...

Hi,

The relation for the building .. using buildingpart (Relation: Shoe Haus (14468310)) does not match the OSM wiki for building parts... see building:part=*

Also Way: 1086891261 crosses it self and the tagging makes little sense... I take it as a simple building wall ... and OSM does not map those...

Hi
relation/14437194 is in error ...

The way with the role 'inner' is not an inner... it touches the outer.

The outer doubles back on itself to create the hole ... the hole should be a separate way with the role inner...
For a complete explanation see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

You have made no attempt to fix the error .. and I have in the past done as you suggest by fixing your error .. getting tired of it .. with little to no response for you ... suggest you fix it rather than leave it for others to fix. Thank you.
You will observe my normal response time ... it can be longer when I'm away, but I do respond especially when I'm mapping.

Bugger ... not certain why I deleted the building tag! My error.

Fixed.

Using a circle is a simplification, the AFL pitch should be much larger. Using the AFL boundaries as the cricket boundary is incorrect.

Rules? - thus for cricket
A circular cricket field is considered as the perfect field but generally a cricket pitch is slightly oval. Its diameter varies between 137m and 150m. The ICC Test Match Standard Playing Conditions (October 2014) Law 19.1 defines the playing area as a minimum of 137.16m from boundary to boundary square of the pitch, with the shorter of the two square boundaries a minimum of 59.43m. The straight boundary at both ends of the pitch is a minimum of 64m. Distances are measured from the centre of the pitch. All boundaries are marked by a rope or similar object as per the ICC rules

Hi,
sport=cricket_nets is valid and better than sport=cricket;cricket_nets, net=yes

Bullfighting... ??? I don't believe it. At what looks like a residential address...

Hi

There are now gaps in the relations for train routes ...
Relation: Brisbane XPT (8406942)
Relation: North West Xplorer 223 (12418296)

Perhaps you could keep an eye on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.58109&lat=-33.22853&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes ?

------------
The link for the TfNSW TOC Manual is still pending a file upload... see osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#New_South_Wales

Bing can have offset errors ... use DCS Imagery and Base Map for better accuracy

Bing can have offset errors. Suggest you refer to DCS Imagery and Base Map for better accuracy of the locations

Hi
The warning 'close node vertices' in this instance indicates 2 nodes exist where one node should be used. I have merged these to fix the issue.

Most buildings have square corners ... these are hard to draw exactly right... When the way is selected a press of the 'q' key will square them up .. makes the corners square and looks better.

From osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

"multipolygon are used to represent areas (polygons), typically complex areas with holes inside, or consisting of multiple disjoint areas"

The relation/14440396 is not correct. Further it is not the way to map buildings consistng of multiple parts ...

See osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon "multipolygon are used to represent areas (polygons), typically complex areas with holes inside, or consisting of multiple disjoint areas" .. this relation shares segments .. so it is not "disjointed"

See building:part=* "Areas with the tag building:part=* allow you to differentiate a building into parts that differ from each other in terms of some building attributes or the building function. "

Part revert to restore relation/10406083

The DCS Base Map gives the names to some of these buildings .. and those named would be, for the most part, homesteads

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

The way/981879114 is not quite right ...
building=yes means all of it is a building
sport=shooting_range .. umm the range part can be dropped.

I'd tag the area as a sports centre ... see leisure=sports_centre

Does the club control the whole facility? If so leave the club tag and name tag on this outer way. If not then I'd map one of the buildings and put the club tags on that...

The OSM wiki can be very helpfull, there is a search field on t he top right of the wiki pages..