Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 106520732 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 120500045 | over 3 years ago | Added note.
|
| 120500045 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
has areas tagged as trees - in cannot be both tree and grass .. chose one. the name suggests the area is a reserve ... and it should be tagged as a reserve not a grassland? |
| 120410755 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
In this case I have combined the 2 ways into one simple way. Then transferred the relation tags to the way ... and then deleted the relation. |
| 120436494 | over 3 years ago | Hi, The parking areas don't extend to teh center of footpaths - should be drawn as a separate way.
|
| 101831379 | over 3 years ago | Hi
|
| 120023207 | over 3 years ago | Trick...
|
| 117929826 | over 3 years ago | One relation outer way cannot touch an outer way of the same relation. Note - same relation. I have used a single way as a member in several relations with the role outer, some state borders with council borders and national parks borders .. so at least 5 things all using the same way. Within any of those relations no outer way shares a node or segment with another way in that relation - other than where ways join together to make a single boundary. That help? Might make things more confusing - apologies if so. |
| 117187613 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
The OSM key 'natural' is not well named! "Used to describes natural physical land features, including ones that have been modified or created by humans." ... so even 'man made' things can use the key 'natural'... See natural=* Note my inclusion of landcover=grass. I think this is a more logical tag - say what it means without any extra explanation - at least to english speakers. |
| 117187613 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 119994605 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
In this case I would draw one outer way around the outside of the entire thing. Then draw the inner ways. |
| 117929826 | over 3 years ago | area=yes on way/1035904925 makes no sense. tag deleted. area=yes on Way: 1035904926 make no sense. The way does not need to be included in the tree multipolygon and can simply be tagged as a tree area. I think you have used Maxar imagery for some of this, this is probably the most upto date, use the DCS for fine detail (resolution). |
| 110599035 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
??? |
| 97599151 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
What makes this path have special features for jogging? Is not jogging a form of running? |
| 119907753 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
Some other comments? (nit picking)
The residential are does not go to the road centre. The road, its verge and foot path are landuse=highway, so the residential are is set back from the road. |
| 119915357 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
The combined tennis and basketball court ... I prefer to map these individually as 2 separate things .. they overlay one another but that is what they do. For example see way/459026975#map=18/-33.76416/150.69128 |
| 89716576 | over 3 years ago | I do hope you have stopped mapping leisure=pitch as more that the playing area of the sport... in this case I think the Bowls Club was better mapped as sports centre.. alternate landuse=recreation_ground. |
| 119889362 | over 3 years ago | Opps, that is Kalamunda, Perth, WA! |
| 65946258 | over 3 years ago | Please don't use LIST ... it is copyright and should not be used for OSM. Other image sources have copyright waivers for use with OSM. |
| 109328419 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|