Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 117952102 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.21293&lat=-33.86641&zoom=18 A site relation maybe better. The DCS Imagery looks better than bing .. and I have found it to be better for location too. As a user of both libraries ... The Mitchell is where you go for the older Mitchell historic stuff. This has a separate request/collection area. If you request it in the other building you'll be directed to the Mitchell for collection. Additionally there is a more select area for the oldest stuff with more eyes on you. The building is named the "Michell Library' and can be seen over the front entrance, operated by the state library. |
| 117630029 | almost 4 years ago | These errors should be fixed. |
| 117727986 | almost 4 years ago | Looks like the residential relation appears. |
| 117798220 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 117724257 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
Most buildings are 'square' - have right angles. You should be able to use the 'Q' key to square up your entries - simply press the Q key while the building/thing is still being edited and that should make it 'square'. |
| 117757262 | almost 4 years ago | The website for Sorrento Park is https://www.mornpen.vic.gov.au/Activities/Parks-Reserves/Parks-Recreation/Sorrento-Park
|
| 117727986 | almost 4 years ago | Q1 Is the name for the buildings or the development? If for the development then a nested relation could be done. The pedantic may chose to make it an inner in the outer residential relation. If for the buildings .. then site is the best that you can do I think. |
| 117616080 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 117727986 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.76253&lat=-32.09809&zoom=18 Possibly a site relation? |
| 80428522 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 117629999 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, This one too fails PTV2 .. see
|
| 117630029 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 117595296 | almost 4 years ago | Good. I would try to fit the route members to fit into either 'Public Transport version 1' or, my preference, 'Public Transport version 2'. I did a simple guide to v2 on @Warin61/diary/45106, mainly so I could refer to it when I got confused! Sometimes the OSM wiki is not the best for a quick guide - which is what I want most of the time. Been discussing this on the talk-au list ... There is a use of the key 'passenger' that I was not aware of .. passenger=tourist may be a good tag to add to your routes. |
| 117595296 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 117615515 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
I suggest using the tag 'description' for things like "Wyndham TV Transmission site", or 'operator' for "Coleman Transport". I have increased the industrial area for "Wyndham TV Transmission site" to encompass the area that appears to be used. The circular- buildings might be man_made=silo? |
| 117543427 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 29013294 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 115136339 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 117378197 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, When a footway crosses a building .. there is either an entrance - should be mapped as a node on both the footway and building, or the building is a roof and should be tagged layer=1 (or 1 higher than the footway layer).
|
| 117180958 | almost 4 years ago | One of the 'problems' is that renders regard landuse=forest to be the same as natural=wood. The Putty State Forest includes grass areas .. and residential areas ... these should not be excluded form it. Much like a National Park has tree areas, rock areas, grass areas.. all part of the National Park. The mapper who added the large tree area is simply mapping trees - not the land use. |