Ug. The multipolygon relation shares outer segments .. so that is an error.

I have deleted the relation and combined th eouter ways into one way.

So now the single building is one way - truly singular.

Oh .. if this is a reserve then it should be tagged as a reserve, not an area of trees.

Renders change what they show depending on magnification. They do this as 'over developed' places have too much information that would overwhelm the map without reducing what they show.

Hi,

Multipolygon relation is not closed. Note source is childish.

Hi,

Small error - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.59278&lat=-28.79454&zoom=18

You missed some ...

e.g
way/729076806/history

opps "cannot share segments"! not 'shere'

Hi
Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot shere segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.95643&lat=-20.34661&zoom=18

Note: source 'aerial imagery' does not say which imagery was used.. Bing, Ersi, Maxar, ?

To me it looks like the south west section is a covered walkway and would then be best entered as a simple way tagged highway=footway, covered=yes.

Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments.

relation/12513626 has been deleted and the 2 ways correctly tagged one as house the other as roof.

These 'Tanks' are not buildings out here, they are reservoirs, no roof + built up embankments to contain water

More corrections to be done ...

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.57076&lat=-35.00968&zoom=17

In this area of the world it would be hard to find permanent water.

? prison ? Ummm

? Centre of National Resilience ? Arr found a link. So that is 'ok', I think.

access=permissive implies public has access that could be withdrawn... I'd think access=private would be 'better' as it is more restrictive.

Error.
The Shark Bay Marine Park ... is not 3 unclosed ways .. but an area. This would be better mapped as a multipolygon.

Other errors fixed - Repaired relations for Mainland Australia and Wooramel Rv watershed.

Hi,

Could you take a look at MacPherson Street cycle route - relation/8395310. It is very disjointed.

Hi,

relation/12333636 for Mount Evelyn Tennis Club deleted. The courts and building are part of the sports centre, so the outer way is simply tagged as the sports centre.

Josm gives a warning ... too easily ignored I would think.
If, when splitting, the adjoining ways were downloaded then the relation order can be checked/used for the split ... It is yet another step when splitting but can save some work later.

Don't worry too much about it. I think I have repaired about as many as I damaged in my earlier mapping...

Errr ... image link is to google.

Are you using this to obtain information???

Please respond to this message.

No attempt to fix.... and quite a few other errors.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.89630&lat=-31.99329&zoom=12

Easiest and quickest for me is to simply delete them.

I did not know what you did.

It looks like when you split the ways (why did you do that? out of interest, the railway lines tags? What changes were made there ? I did not look.) they got put into the relation in the wrong order - so if the route was going east to west then the split ways were put in the order of west to east.. and that breaks the order of the ways in the route.

Problem .. these route are big .. e.g. Perth to Sydney. Perhaps downloading the connecting ways at each end to the ways you split might give enough information to check and if required correct the order of the split ways??