Josm gives a warning ... too easily ignored I would think.
If, when splitting, the adjoining ways were downloaded then the relation order can be checked/used for the split ... It is yet another step when splitting but can save some work later.

Don't worry too much about it. I think I have repaired about as many as I damaged in my earlier mapping...

Errr ... image link is to google.

Are you using this to obtain information???

Please respond to this message.

No attempt to fix.... and quite a few other errors.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.89630&lat=-31.99329&zoom=12

Easiest and quickest for me is to simply delete them.

I did not know what you did.

It looks like when you split the ways (why did you do that? out of interest, the railway lines tags? What changes were made there ? I did not look.) they got put into the relation in the wrong order - so if the route was going east to west then the split ways were put in the order of west to east.. and that breaks the order of the ways in the route.

Problem .. these route are big .. e.g. Perth to Sydney. Perhaps downloading the connecting ways at each end to the ways you split might give enough information to check and if required correct the order of the split ways??

Following relations repaired from this changeset actions:

Train - Dudbo XPT
Trains - India Pacific ... both directions
Trains - Broken Hill Explorer

Road - Great Western Hwy...

There maybe others...

Hi,

Continuing problems with duplicated segments.

Suggest you monitor them using https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.57146&lat=-35.00876&zoom=17

and fix them as they show up.

Hi,

Relation for farmland 12433390 is wrong. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.90453&lat=-36.84789&zoom=14.

This does not need to be a relation at all. Tag the ways themselves as farmland .. and delete the relation.

I'll leave it to you to fix?

Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

way/918269755 (building=yes) crosses it self ... forming an error.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.28555&lat=-33.75305&zoom=18

Some additional ideas. This looks to be several buildings and each of them look to be 'retail' so building=retail could be a better tag. And they can be divided up into individual buildings.

I'll leave it to you to fix/modify.

P.S. The DCS Base Map has addresses, beaches and park boundaries on it ...

No attempt to fix the errors... I'll delete then.

Confirmed. Was looking at Newcastle as being the local centre rather than the state centre.
Platform 1 also gets you stations to Scone, Dungog etc.. further away from Sydney, so a little confusing.

The building:part should do its job. However I added level=1 to them, while leaving the base without a level tag - so that should equal level=0.

Note Should not do too much for the rendering .. this is only one render - other renders do things differently.

area=yes is not required on most things.

Ok... I'll change them as I come across them... it was confusing to have a north bound train cross to the other tracks inorder to go the the 'right' platform number.

relation/12413048 makes no sense!
It was tagged a multipolygon with outers inside another outer.
I have deleted it and placed the amenity tag on the building.

The way 'Auburn Bowling Club' has no real major tag - one that will render. Add 'landuse=recreation_ground' and that should then render.

Wyong Station.

Has 3 platforms. You have look to mislabeled the platform numbers ignoring the platform to the east .. which should be platform 1, then your platform 1 becomes 2 while 2 becomes 3...

Hi,
The Hamilton platform numbers look wrong.
Platform 1 is normally the up line, leading to Newcastle (so this would be on the north eastern side) ... but you have tagged it on the down line leading away from Newcastle. Similar for platform 2.

Note that all the other station platforms follow this pattern on this and other lines.

Please see new relation for 'Hunter line to Scone'
relation/12409977

to come:
'Hunter line from Scone'
'Hunter line to Dungog'
'Hunter line from Dungog'

Note New lines added to make them continuous. Some guess work as to where track changes take place, I think this will change with what traffic there is on the lines andway.

Errr 4 routes...

Arr yes... This is acually tagged as a 'route' as such it should go from A to B.. as it is in OSM it was A to B .. and C to B and B to A and B to C.. these need to entered as 2 routes.. working on it.

I was thinking this was a 'railway line' rather than a route .. but I stand (sit) corrected.