Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 25872761 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
|
| 40410339 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
|
| 39323095 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
|
| 39783775 | over 9 years ago | way/422672861 tagged as 'building=yes' should be only on the building footprint - not the property boundaries.
|
| 12495881 | over 9 years ago | Charles Sturt Uni ... you had tennis courts .. I have changes these to netbal as that is what is shown by ht eLPI Imagery and Base Map. |
| 36632112 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
|
| 41157834 | over 9 years ago | In iD select the background layer as LPI Base Map. Now you can see how 'Rotary Drive' (way/48200084) follows the boundary of the Clyde River National Park and not the road itself. The LPI Base Map is not perfect - select the iD base layer as LPI Imagery ... you' ll see differences from time to time. You'll also find the LPI Imagery to be better (finer detail) than the Bing imagery. Hope that helps.
|
| 41141605 | over 9 years ago | Too quick for me. Thanks for the correction. |
| 39288141 | over 9 years ago | If you are going to change it to some other source ... remove the source=LPI etc.. tag from the relation. And put in what ever source you are using. Note that the areas excluded in the LPI data may have legal easements on them .. they may be included in a map by the Western Sydney Parklands .. but they have other legal uses too. |
| 41077061 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
And .. Way: Rotary Drive (391118035) is not Rotary drive .. but part of the boundary of the H]National Park .. this road goes between the two boundaries .. I think you may have deleted one of the boundaries. This way also travels along Kings Highway on the north eastern side. As a guide;
Keep mapping! |
| 39288141 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
|
| 39110544 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
Looks to my eye that there is a legal easement between these ways(I assume from the LPI base map view). This may not be evident on the ground. Please look at the area with the LPI base Map view enabled so you can compare what you see on the ground with what the legal aspects are? If what you want to add is a fence line .. then add a new way .. the fence line and legal boundary may not be the same. |
| 36919692 | over 9 years ago | relation/5929494 removed landuse=forest added natural=wood, combined with the 'old' relationship 5929493. |
| 36987123 | over 9 years ago | I don't think 'aerial imagery' is adequate ... is this from Bing or Mapbox or some other source? |
| 40531718 | over 9 years ago | Tagging for ONE render? Where other renders use the sport= tag ... such as OSMAnd? I think the correct tag should be applied so that all the renders can 'see' it.
|
| 40537602 | over 9 years ago | Some sports shops sell food, drinks, clothing ...
|
| 40531718 | over 9 years ago | "mechanical edits"? ... you mean that using JOSMs 'Download for API...' cannot be done to identify incorrectly tagged objects (see the wiki shop=sports for "use sport=" NOT osm.wiki/Tag:sports=!!!!) ???????? |
| 40537602 | over 9 years ago | P.S. Don't blame me for the inconsistency with OSM tags.. I'd much rather use something like sells=* to specify what a shop/vending_machine sells. |
| 40537602 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
|
| 36893649 | over 9 years ago | Hi,
|