OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
25872761 over 9 years ago

Hi,
I have changed way/23641312 (West Witney Sports Ground).
Pitches are best on the actual pitches - I have added some of these as separate ways in this area.
The area I think is a recreation ground .. so I have tagged the way as such.

40410339 over 9 years ago

Hi,
Building=residential Way: 428418578 should be building=farm (main residential building of farm) .. and ways 428418576 and 428418572 (were building=farm) don't look like residence .. so I have them as building=yes.
See building=farm

39323095 over 9 years ago

Hi,
I have changed the 'basketball' courts to netball ... e.g. way/418200418. That is what they appear to be in LPI Imagery.

39783775 over 9 years ago

way/422672861 tagged as 'building=yes' should be only on the building footprint - not the property boundaries.
node/4224101948 has many tags the same as the above way ... so it is an unwanted repetition.

12495881 over 9 years ago

Charles Sturt Uni ... you had tennis courts .. I have changes these to netbal as that is what is shown by ht eLPI Imagery and Base Map.

36632112 over 9 years ago

Hi,
Relation: Store Beach (2927697) is not closed. I think this may be left as a simple way - not a relation?

41157834 over 9 years ago

In iD select the background layer as LPI Base Map. Now you can see how 'Rotary Drive' (way/48200084) follows the boundary of the Clyde River National Park and not the road itself. The LPI Base Map is not perfect - select the iD base layer as LPI Imagery ... you' ll see differences from time to time. You'll also find the LPI Imagery to be better (finer detail) than the Bing imagery.

Hope that helps.

41141605 over 9 years ago

Too quick for me. Thanks for the correction.

39288141 over 9 years ago

If you are going to change it to some other source ... remove the source=LPI etc.. tag from the relation. And put in what ever source you are using.

Note that the areas excluded in the LPI data may have legal easements on them .. they may be included in a map by the Western Sydney Parklands .. but they have other legal uses too.

41077061 over 9 years ago

Hi,
You look to have added some roads to the boundary relation of the Clyde River National Park? And Possibly deleted an outer way for this relation?
Relation: 5857616
Ways that don't look to be part of it ? :
Way: Driveway (434309908)
Way: Snapper Point Road (434309903)

And .. Way: Rotary Drive (391118035) is not Rotary drive .. but part of the boundary of the H]National Park .. this road goes between the two boundaries .. I think you may have deleted one of the boundaries. This way also travels along Kings Highway on the north eastern side.

As a guide;
.. add things .. try not to delete stuff.
one feature on ht eground = one enity in OSM.

Keep mapping!

39288141 over 9 years ago

Hi,
I have restored the Western Sydney Parklands boundaries to the LPI Administration Boundaries ... please leave these alone, they are the legal boundaries and include rights of way etc.
I have retained a change made by you as a fence - Way: 434837423, please modify this 'fence' as appropriate? It does appear to be a fence at least in part.

39110544 over 9 years ago

Hi,
looks like you have made some changes to the boundaries of the Western Sydney Parklands. There is a conflict in the outer ways sharing the same space. I have moved the southern part of Way: 402801662 and the northern western Way: 402801663. You have added gates to Way: 402801663 ... umm gates usually go with a fence.. and the fence may not follow the leagal park boundaries?

Looks to my eye that there is a legal easement between these ways(I assume from the LPI base map view). This may not be evident on the ground.

Please look at the area with the LPI base Map view enabled so you can compare what you see on the ground with what the legal aspects are?

If what you want to add is a fence line .. then add a new way .. the fence line and legal boundary may not be the same.

36919692 over 9 years ago

relation/5929494 removed landuse=forest added natural=wood, combined with the 'old' relationship 5929493.

36987123 over 9 years ago

I don't think 'aerial imagery' is adequate ... is this from Bing or Mapbox or some other source?

40531718 over 9 years ago

Tagging for ONE render? Where other renders use the sport= tag ... such as OSMAnd? I think the correct tag should be applied so that all the renders can 'see' it.
It would be indulgent to apply different tagging that others do not use.

40537602 over 9 years ago

Some sports shops sell food, drinks, clothing ...
But the OSM convention is to use sport=* to specify what sport (or multiple sport using the ; as a separator). I have started a topic on the talk uk list.

40531718 over 9 years ago

"mechanical edits"? ... you mean that using JOSMs 'Download for API...' cannot be done to identify incorrectly tagged objects (see the wiki shop=sports for "use sport=" NOT osm.wiki/Tag:sports=!!!!) ????????

40537602 over 9 years ago

P.S. Don't blame me for the inconsistency with OSM tags.. I'd much rather use something like sells=* to specify what a shop/vending_machine sells.

40537602 over 9 years ago

Hi,
please see the wiki ... it says "Use sport=* to specify more details of sold products, useful values can be taken from sport key. "
shop=sports

36893649 over 9 years ago

Hi,
The Broadway Post Office Node: 3977545159 ... from the LPI base map is across the road - same building .. I have added it. One of the two needs to be deleted ... leave it to you?