OpenStreetMap
Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 96130331 | almost 5 years ago | The comment remains. And is directed at the mapper who made the changes... comments made do get flagged to the mapper. The stated source is DCS Imagery. The changes made are not on the DCS imagery.
|
| 96130331 | almost 5 years ago | This does not appear on the DCS imagery... what is the source of this information?
Reasons why I ask? I'm looking at your Grafton Jail edits and cannot see the information in the source provided. |
| 99664314 | almost 5 years ago | Best to say what the imagery is then so as not to confuse nor strain your memory in a few years time.
What app you are using is easily seen - eg look at changeset/99664314. The relation problem I sent you a comment some 2 days ago on another relation - this is just a repeat of the same problem. Have fun. |
| 99592470 | almost 5 years ago | Arr .. good oh.
|
| 99664314 | almost 5 years ago | Errr ... imagery use Gmaps Sat? Is that Google related? |
| 99664314 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Are the building, car park really not part of the resort??? By making them 'inners' in the relation they are excluded from the resort. |
| 99592470 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Think you may have the construction mixed up with the existing road - see Way: The Northern Road (369219092) |
| 99553813 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, The 'inners' would be part of the club. As 'inners' in the relation they are excluded from being part of the club... So I don't think it is correct for the club. ----------------------------------
If the outer way is the limit of the club only then it should not have a building tag .. probably landuse=recreation_ground. |
| 83416104 | almost 5 years ago | highway=closed is not valid. I have set the old section of the Pacific Hwy to
|
| 59714168 | almost 5 years ago | Hi
What should be in the relation are places it does stop... those are missing. The other thing is the direction .. the relation is only for one direction as tracks and stops can be on different sides, at least in some places. |
| 99293421 | almost 5 years ago | Fixed:
Way: 907255818 - combined with other outer ways in forest relation to make one simple way.
|
| 92547819 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks.
Andrew - looks like the State Park could do with some land cover mapping. |
| 99353921 | almost 5 years ago | Error ... Building SAGE inside building Tonsley MAB... Possibly use building:part ? |
| 99299846 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
Why is this a multipolygon at all? Would a simple closed way not do the job? Same question for 80 collins st... a simple way would do. |
| 99293421 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, The multipolygon relation for 'landuse=forest' has at least 2 errors... Way: 476166959 appears to have nothing to do with the relation. The outerways of the relation self intersect and share segments .. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.58339&lat=-38.28349&zoom=15 |
| 99143241 | almost 5 years ago | Read all of the proposal for parking_space to aid your understanding.
|
| 99220445 | almost 5 years ago | HI, 3 errors in relationship roles - should be outers... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.10719&lat=-40.49454&zoom=12 |
| 85413956 | almost 5 years ago | 6 months and still not fixed! relation/11117034 has now been fixed..... as has another of your relations ... Learn how to make multipolygons. |
| 99143241 | almost 5 years ago | Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.
|
| 99069106 | almost 5 years ago | Both relations will have the same problem. These multipolygon relation outerways cannot share segments... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.79191&lat=-32.92436&zoom=18 |