Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 93721912 | about 5 years ago | Have you visited this area? There looks to be considerable conflict between areas tagged as 'scree' and 'bear rock'. Then there is the question of 'heath' and 'tundra'. |
| 93707851 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
I would also like to know why you have deleted buildings already entered and what source you used for the changes. |
| 92899500 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 93690232 | about 5 years ago | Not a question of 'may have', there are crossing buildings. Crossing buildings are identified by the JOSM validator before you download the data to OSM.
|
| 91792476 | about 5 years ago | ~50 overlapping buildings deleted. |
| 91792476 | about 5 years ago | No response. |
| 93568425 | about 5 years ago | Hi Multiploygon relations outer ways cannot share segments with inner ways. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.46921&lat=-36.38647&zoom=17 |
| 93354055 | about 5 years ago | Partial reversion - broken boundary of National Park. |
| 93441168 | about 5 years ago | Hi Buildings don't go inside other buildings .. at least not in OSM. What is needed is building:part! See building:part=* Please change C39, C40, C41, C42 and any others I have missed. |
| 93450000 | about 5 years ago | Hi, The relation for Porky Beach Conservation Area was broken by some of this changeset so it is in part reverted. |
| 92521154 | about 5 years ago | Hi William,
I have assumed the deletions were an error so the deleted buildings have been restored. Also fixed new building with 2 extra nodes causing crossings. |
| 93317967 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Lake Eppalock looks to occupy a much larger area than you have mapped. See the Esri World Imagery Clarity Beta. |
| 93318611 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM.. Water tanks used for fire fighting are somewhat larger than a few yards in diameter. The tank - way/865531540 - would at best be used for gardening... probably only = 100 litres. For fire fighting as a minimum 5,000 litres would be a better idea. |
| 93283924 | about 5 years ago | Hi, The multipolygon relation/11811268 has outers that share ways. This is a no no for these kind of relations. Secondly ... the 'shelter' is not what I'd call it in OSM terms.. "A small structure for protection against bad weather"??? The center is a building=train_station in OSM terms, while the outer 2 structures are roofs. |
| 92690535 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Three things... The changeset comment is not very descriptive.... see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments The name should not be an abbreviation see osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 The source is OSM .. I don't think the the geospacial accuracy can be improved using it. |
| 91015013 | about 5 years ago | Hi
Restored. |
| 90706742 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
Removal of way/318672901 from the wood relation has removed the outer way for this area ... meaning it is not there...
Take care, keep mapping. |
| 85972396 | about 5 years ago | No response. Deleted. |
| 91792476 | about 5 years ago | Hi Building way/853560579 has; duplicated segfments crosses other buildings... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.37443&lat=-31.10353&zoom=18&opacity=0.64 You should repair this. |
| 92643482 | about 5 years ago | Sorry - one is a simple way (not a node). |