The imagery does not say that way/780244240 is used for forestry, it only says there are trees here, so a more appropriate tag is natural=wood.

Looks to be a conflict between tags used on some of these areas. They are tagged for both grass (landuse=grass, so covered with grass) and natural=scrub (so covered with scrub). Which is it, grass or scrub?

Hi,

You have added a number of 'place=square'. These should be inside some village, please map and name the villages, you should be able to do this from your survey.
Thanks.

Hi,
relation/10790614 -farmland and scrub looks to have several problems? An outer that is inside an outer. Covers some water ... with scrub? And having both scrub and farmland as primary tags... rather confusing.

The value 'Breakfast Creek' was place on a farmyard. It is now placed on a building as addr:housename=Breakfast Creek.
This is not correct. It should be tagged as name=Breakfast Creek on the building as it is the name of the homestead.

This is certainly not an 'isolated_dwelling' in Australia.

It is certainly not a location name here.

There is no problem with overlapping areas where the area are of unrelated things e.g. land covers can over lap land uses. The validator is giving a warning not an instruction.

Hi,
way/775161958 tagged highway=footway with construction=yes is not how OSM does that ... it is highway=construction with construction=footway. Fixed this one.

Please revise your edits where construction=* has been left behind and the tag highway=construct has been altered.

Hi,

I have deleted maxspeed=sign - not valid, on way/173806929.

Hi,
way/724653634 - Manly Warringah War Memorial Park is also know as 'Manly Dam' - see https://www.northernbeaches.nsw.gov.au/things-to-do/parks-and-trails/parks/manly-dam.
Possibly taking the LPI Base Map park extents and the OSM golf area out would give the closest boundary for this park? Certainly better than what OSM has now.

Arr looks to be confirmed from
https://files.northernbeaches.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/general-information/parks-and-trails/manlydamtrackandtrailmap.pdf

'Manly Dam' could be an alternative name?

Hi,

Welcome to OSM!

That is a nice try at mapping some detail in the parking area! Very good, but it can be better.

First the areas mapped as leisure=park? Not really a park is it? More like grass, so landuse=grass .. unfortunately ... OSM has some inconsistencies and this is one, grass is not really a land use but there we are ... OSM uses it.

Next problem. The way in which th enorthern and southern grass areas are mapped. The way intercepts itself. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.52591&lat=-38.58893&zoom=18. What you can do is map one of them as a simple small rectangle, then copy and paste it to the other areas.

Next problem. The parking area should not include the grassed areas .. as they are not used for parking.

A simple node with amenity=parking is what most beginners do. Well done for doing more! Don't worry about the details too much, the above suggestions should take care of them.

Hi,

When you change highway=construction to something else you should also delete the tag construction=*.

Hi,
This changeset broke the relation for Melaleuca Green. It did this by deleting way/126189833.

I have tried to repair this by partially reverting this changeset.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

You may be concerned why Node: Glencoe (6981753228) is not rendering?

I think the name tag needs to be associated, in this case, with a building? Or is it some retirement home area?

In any case, I think the name tag is confusing the rendering of the address. So removing the name from the address node should get that to render.

Tagging something with a name only will not get it rendered.
Node: Marsden High School Australian Flagpole (7018845045) only has a name and OSM does not interpret names but will display them when associated with relevant tags. In this case see man_made=flagpole.

Hi,
The source for the address data for node Mill Building (7150221076) cannot be had from imagery. Did you mean survey?

The name will not show up as there are no physical tags here, and the name looks like it confuses the rendering of the address.

In this instance I would use the imagery to map be building as a closed way with the name on that and tag it building=yes or some more specific building type. Leave the node as the address, and delete the name from that. That should work.

Enjoy.

Best effort is all any of us can do.

Reason why I looked was because some 19% of building=farm have a name within Australia, I thought that would be higher. So I got the ones in NSW so I could add names to them from the LPI Base Map .. and yours turned up (similar to my collection in area).

Carry on, there is heaps to map.

Don't know the history of the farm/aux... OSM like us evolves. Such is life.

Good question on the homestead vs house.

My take is .. if you look on the LPI Base Map and it has a name then it is probably old enough to be a homestead, otherwise possibly a house. Very good question. No hard and fast rule from me, just a guide. And I can be wrong.

Yep, 'farms' too are evolving. Pre WW2 we had smaller farms, then they amalgamated as they got larger and larger tractors ... Now they are going back the other way with 'hobby farms'. Still have the larger farms out in the country, don't think those will disappear any time soon.

Oh, the LPI Base Map I think shows residences as filled in squares - solid black, where as the aux. are an outline only.

HI,
This round building Way: 640284121 ... is it a residence?

Hi,
the tag building=farm is for residential buildings on a farm. I believe these are building=farm_auxiliary i.e. not residences but sheds, barns etc ???

I think you have tagged the homesteads as building=house .. I personally prefer to segregate these homesteads from city homes by using building=farm.
Thoughts?