OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
68490661 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!
One of the more difficult concepts are relations. The other ways of a multipolygon cannot touch.

In this case it is not required. It is a building with multiple parts ...
Draw a way around the outside of all of it and put the tags on that, this is the base. Then on each part that is higher than the base make a new way with the tag building:part .. see building:part=*

63059764 almost 7 years ago

Hi

Disused is tagged disused:*=* not disused=yes. See disused=*:
Fixed Darlimurla railway station tagging.

63814727 almost 7 years ago

Hi,

This note should be placed on the bridge itself .. not on a node that has no physical feature and is not connected to the bridge. I have attached the node to the bridge. So that is fixed. But ..

Same with the chalet .. I have re-tagged this as a building=hut. I hope that suits.

2593214 almost 7 years ago

Deleting tags on node
506125328 no physical features, nor anything that makes sense.

2592999 almost 7 years ago

Deleting tags on node
506117053 no physical features, nor anything that makes sense.

61214120 almost 7 years ago

I would suggest that a foot way Way: 612473561 does not go through a pavilion.. needs fixing!

61214120 almost 7 years ago

You now have a shelter and foot path in the middle of a group tennis courts

Deleted! Bing does not show these .. they appear to be fictional.

64635398 almost 7 years ago

Hi
For way/407170306 you changed highway=construction to highway=cycleway but failed to remove construction=cycleway .. so is it finished (remove construction=cycleway) or still being constructed (restore highway=construction)???

46291679 almost 7 years ago

Hi
same comment about construction on way/145072554

46291538 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
The change on way/145072552 from railway=construction to railway=rail has left behind construction = rail. Is the construction on going .. in which case railway=construction should be restored. If the construction is finished then construction=rail needs to be removed.

38370577 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
This tower named 'rain guage' ...
how high is it? If it is only, say 1 meter, then I'd rather tag the rain gauge itself with
man_made=monitoring_station

monitoring:weather=yes

weather:ombrometer=yes

(an ombrometer is a rain gauge).

Regards

9328252 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
These 'Rain Gauges' you have tagged as silos ... they don't appear to be what I would call 'silos'.

Are these weather monitoring rain gauges??? If so OSM has tags for them now
man_made=monitoring_station

monitoring:weather=yes

weather:ombrometer=yes

(OSM evolves .. new tags get introduced so 'we' can make a better amp).

Regards.

64478620 almost 7 years ago

Done. Last 2 sections. Some have been in 'construction' since 2014.

I have left a bit at the top .. not present in bing
Way: Midland Highway (642356069) + a roundabout.

64478620 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
They have been there for some years!
I have removed the ones OSNInspector pointed too .. but will check for others.
As the last person to modify these, I thought I should comment on it so you'd be aware of the problem and might spot it next time.

59934192 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
What is node/348196316 name=tummies corner ??
It is no good simply adding a name .. there has to be something to it.
Secondly .. one feature, one osm entry. This node is used by various things already.. make another node .. possibly place=locality???

64478620 almost 7 years ago

Hi,

highway=trunk/residential with construction=trunk/residential could be taken as either construction or finished. If it is finished please delete the construction=*.

I have corrected this for the Midland Hwy.

68360967 almost 7 years ago

The source you use - LPI Imagery shows that part of the Wianamatta Parkway is under construction. I have changed this section back.

68360967 almost 7 years ago

Why do you think these roads are any thing other than 'unclassified'???
The LPI Base Map suggests they are not secondary/tertiary.

68044110 almost 7 years ago

No response. Deleted.

68287675 almost 7 years ago

1) OSM has very strict rules about the source of information entered.

What is the source of this information?

2) The changeset comment makes no sense. What is it referring too?