Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 65503229 | about 7 years ago | Anothe rinner inside an inner - fixed this one for you .
|
| 65501223 | about 7 years ago | Cannot have an inner inside and inner - oxymoron. Remove the inner inner ... and tag it something .. like what it is? |
| 65498913 | about 7 years ago | Hi,
Note .. these errors crop up in the Quality Assurance tools .. that is how I come to see them. Not tracking you specifically. |
| 13648365 | about 7 years ago | Restored these names!
|
| 15025105 | about 7 years ago | The QAA line is a single road running east west .. I don't think it includes the roads running off it north/south... |
| 15953453 | about 7 years ago | Deleted - no response |
| 64670540 | about 7 years ago | salut Que signifie OCA? S'il vous plaît, faites en sorte que vos commentaires de groupe soient plus descriptifs. Certains de ces bâtiments recouvrent les bâtiments déjà entrés. spot = null et type = null mean? Il n'y a pas de signification pour cela dans OSM. Hi
|
| 64366505 | about 7 years ago | Poppy Drive the same
Don't over lay. |
| 65426277 | about 7 years ago | Hi,
amenity=courthouse only renders the scale symbol .. not as a building .. so I had a go myself.. it should now work the way I think it should be rendered.. see what you think? The relation has building=public .. no name. The outer way has amenity=courthouse and the name
(the multipolygon rules are - the members should not have the same tags as the relation. The relation should have some physical/administrative object tagged
|
| 57988336 | about 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 65400791 | about 7 years ago | Hi,Getting there with the relation... but still not 100% The relation type should be multipolygon, not building. The relation should than have another tag (like it has a name tag) - this one is the physical tag for what it is .. a search on 'court' the OSMwiki got amenity=courthouse
The outer way of that relation also has a name .. this is not on. Remove the name from the outer way and it will be better. The outer way/s should not have any tag that is used by the relation. ------------------
|
| 65258634 | about 7 years ago | OK,
|
| 64548746 | about 7 years ago | Fixed. |
| 58909257 | about 7 years ago | Sorry .. my error.
|
| 64278126 | about 7 years ago | Me neither .. had to do some exploring. Not much good for detail. |
| 58909257 | about 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 64835655 | about 7 years ago | Initial thoughts... subject to change! For tags? observatory=astronomical_radio For 'the area'? Either a site relation with each antenna, building etc? or a simple enclosing way? |
| 61997878 | about 7 years ago | Oh,
|
| 61997878 | about 7 years ago | You mean to combine
They look to be separately named ..
As for the third area to the north .. I think some of that should be included in the above 2 parks .. but there does not look to be a good boundary for the Wanda Reserve .. possibly for the Don Lucas Reserve .. looks like a fence line could be used. The third area to the north looks to have several 'names' in OSM .. 'Greenhills' and 'Wanda Sand Hills' appear on the map. |
| 29013179 | about 7 years ago | Hi,
Altering. |