Hi,
An old entry .. but a question on it.
Relation: 2723199
Tags:
"landuse"="forest"
"type"="multipolygon"
"source"="Bing"
Near Laurieton. Is this simply a collection of trees .. or is it used for timber like a state forest? Given the source is bing I'd say it is a collection of trees, rather than used for timber production.

Hi,
Way: 466215252 - forest is not entirely covered with trees.. and if you look closely on th eLPI base map you can see it extends to the east for some distance too. I have extended the area and tagged it as a park. It could be a nature reserve though.

I have deleted some ways.
Some of these look to be in the middle of a building. Others appear to be irregular shapes of what look to be swimming pools - probably private swimming pools.
Remove multiple tags on a few nodes for a simple parking entrance on the same drive way.

Hi,
Bing imagery cannot possibly be the source of these boundaries. What is your source?

Good Luck with it..

HI,
These tags already exist in the relation - they are duplication and I have removed the tags... but

The relation is not closed.. as these 2 ways do not form an area Ways: 594644996 and 594644996.. perhaps they should be removed from the relation untill this can be resolved? Put tags on them when they are removed from the relation to say what they intended to b?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.
Your changeset comment of 'a lot, lot' is not helpfull. Looks to be detailing a residential plot? Why not say so?
Read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for ideas?

The way/594113013 only has thetag area=yes .. but what is it? Looks like it could be a private swimming pool? In which case tag it leisure=swimming_pool with access=private? The way also crosses it self .. so it is rather a confused thing.

The document is copyright ... do you have permission to copy it into OSM?

There is a copyright notice on;

http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/planmanagement//final/20140041WianamattaRPVol1.pdf

https://www.epnsw.com.au/projects/wianamatta-regional-park-masterplan/

and the third document links to
http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/help/copyright-disclaimer.htm

I don't think these are legally usable in OSM due to OSM copyright requirements.

Sigh. I've fixed it .. again. I hope he has better explications of what he is doing ...
Further comments on changeset/59521132 and changeset/59584398

OSM maps the present .. not the predicted future.

You continue to break the relation/6058483 for the Wianamatta Regional Park.

And other relations...

WHY????
What are you trying to disconnect ... ??
Are you trying to disconnect South Creek from the boundaries?
If so .. how about make a way or relation for south creek - a new one. Then remove the tags for south creek from the existing boundaries?

Broken relation/6058483 - wood.
Repaired....

Not fixed... relation/6058483 also uses these ways... leave it to the locals???

Messed up .. not a closed relation presently. Warmbatcher has also beentrying to correct it.

I have used the LPI Base Map to close the relation ..

This has broken relation/6354226 - wetland.
I have corrected this using the NSW LPI Bzse Map ... and changed the appropriate source tags to suit.

Hi,
You set tree=evergreen in relation .. ? not in wiki? It does have leaf_cycle=evergreen so i have set that.

I don't know the area well enough to say it is tundra. I was working on removing sections of the treed area ... and I have now done that ... at least roughly. In the past the entire National Park was tagged as a treed area .. despite the lack of trees above the snow line and that the trees did not start nor stop at the Park boundaries. It is better now. I have left the snow line as it could be useful to compare the present tree area with it.

Hi,

I have used LIP Base Map to make one large park .. there do not look to be any boundaries in the LPI Base Map data.
The way is 592892827 and viewable here way/592892827#map=15/-30.1043/153.2030
I think this might be the true extent of Woolgoolga Beach Reserve?
See https://haveyoursay.coffsharbour.nsw.gov.au/woolgoolga-beach-reserve

Hi,
Way: Car yards (556625873) with the tags:
"name"="Car yards"
"building"="yes"
"shop"="car"

is not a building over that entire area... and is better left tagged as a landuse. Deleted.
The name should not be a description .. but the name only. Deleted.
The shop=car I have moved onto one of the present buildings.