Hi,
Why do you need to store on the data base where bing hi res imagery is? Looking at way/309325239. The do not contribute any usefull features. And the presence of hi res imagery changes over time.

The presence of hi res imagery changes from time to time .. 'We' now have that 'Digital Globe Premium' imagery that looks to be good most places in png.

Hi,
Why do you need to store on the data base where bing hi res imagery is? Looking at way/309325239. Should not you remove these rather than clutter the data base?

Hi,
This changeset looks to have introduced the value 'airstrip'? LINZ defines these as runways. They do appear to be runways - well 4 out of 5 that I have looked at are .. the one missing is not there now, it is a watered field.
Did you introduce this tag 'airstrip' .. or someone else? If it was you .. why not use 'runway' (or 'aerodrome' as it was before your changes)?

Hi,
Questions on way/473880525 - track, grade 4 ..
Firstly this looks to me like it connects some villages .. so it is not just used for forestry/farm things so might be better classified as 'unclassified'?
Grade 4 ? From Bing imagery.. would not think that the grade could be determined from bing imagery?

Hi,
Thanks for entering these while you were there. Some improvements for nest time, unless you have already changed the practice?
These names look like they are all in capitals, they should be lower case maybe with a leading capital letter.
The names should not be descriptive, but the real names used. If you want to add a description then use the description tag e.g. description=vehicle workshop.

No.

Part, and only part, of these streets are used as the boundaries of Parramatta and Westmead councils. So they have to be, at least, in 2 bits.

Use the LPI Base Map to view this information - the pail dotted lines.

Hi
you have tagged way 489615722 as an abandoned. track. Yet it connects to a village and may be used by the locals as a walking track. I have added a new Way: 530426654 that is close to your abandoned track. See what you think.

Umm I have applied the site relation ... see how that goes?

Hi,
Way: 528707198 is self intersecting. That then causes relation/7622059 to have an intersecting segment.
You should separate the way into 2 ways - an inner and an outer.

The relation/7618908... has an inner touch the outer at node/5140696134.

This should not be done. Suggest that the node be removed from the outer way.

Hi,
The changes to
Alfred Cove Marine Park
Alfred Cove Nature Reserve
Milyn Nature Reserve
Pelican Point Nature reserve

conflict with the relation/7619687 Swan Estuary Marin Park by having shared tags.
Humm ... are these part of the Swan Estuary Marin Park? If so then possibly s site relation should be made? If not then remove them?

way/511474998 - named "Vacant'. Surely that is a description? Not a name.

Hi,
Thanks, yes typo.

Looking at Bunyan Lookout Trail (222408586) (using LPI Imagery) which I also changed from path to track I can clearly see 2 wheel tracks - thus it is clearly a trail, not a path.

The Lost World Trail (222408585) is harder to see with the imagery .. it may be wide enough for a vehicle .. but is hard to determine, probably owing to lack of use by vehicles and a dominating use by walkers. It is quite possible that was a trail used by vehicles. And could be used by them again given enough 'enthusiasm' (and permission).

I'm think about it .. and other thoughts? Let me know. (Scratching head ... the Bunyan Lookout Trail is a dead end so I'd find it hard to accept that the remainder had not been made for a vehicle yet that too shows a lack of use by vehicles and dominate use by walkers. ... and the Lost World Trail is a similar dead end ... umm scratching head. OSM definitions of trail/path might be usefull? Umm history elsewhere?
Later. Might do a personal survey to confirm it - though I'd like to avoid the heat)

Hi,
I have added a few more buss stops in Port Moresby. These are base on satellite imagery only and may need correction!!! You look to be more local than me, if so please edit them.
See changeset/52318812#map=14/-9.4500/147.1949

It would be nice to have the buss routes too. Though that is a little bit of work, buss stops first?

Hi,
way/350304629 is tagged as both a water way and a highway. You say that the 'trek' goes on top of the river. So physically this way is a river.
If you want to mark a 'trek' then perhaps a route relation can be used in OSM. Or if it is a ferry (or what passes for a ferry) then a ferry route?
In the mean time .. this way is a river not a path.

HI,
way/526327518 -landuse=forest

It shares segments. This is not on for simple ways - you have to use a relationship - this one needs one outer way and two inner ways.

LandUSE=forest??? Is it really used for harvesting trees? Or simply covered by trees? If simply covered by trees then landcover=trees and natural=wood make more sense.

I have edited this to what I think it should be. But you should look at any others that you have tagged landuse=forest.

Is the area (way/57745482) really named kunai patch .. or is this a description?
Does it have any historic significance other than being on/near the Kokoda Trail?

1) no need to 'feel sorry'. We all make errors.
2) OSM most elemental thing is a 'node' .. that is a dot, point .. it can be by itself to make a shop/office/monument/ or any simple thing consisting of a 'node'.
A line consist of at least 2 'nodes' that make, in OSM terms, a 'way'.
There are a few starting pages on OSM ..
possibly osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide ? See how you go.

3) in your edit you dragged (moved) that node off to the west so the cemetery area went across the road then back in .. rather distorted.
If you go to changeset/52140023 you can see everything you altered .. click on each one and you can see where it is now. If it is wrong you can then edit it some more so it makes better sense.

OK? Have fun.