The government documents don't look to form a route from one place to another but rather to document bicycle infrastructure e.g. bike lanes? Some linkage is shown between the bike lanes.
Are the routes all sign posted with the same 'name'?

The tagging in NSW looks ok. I am not so certain in other parts.

Duplicate tagging is done in various forms in OSM ... seasonal and intermittent for instance. I did nodes so I could be certain of finding them again, they would be 'better' as duplicate relations but then some would say overlapping landuse areas. You cannot win :))

I don't think public access by motor vehicle is allowed... locked gates at access points would indicate that?

The idea is to to avoid the multiple meanings of the tag landuse=forest (as explained in the page Forest) by using the tag landuse=forestry. I never got around to duplicating the relations but used nodes to get an idea of the number. With the increasing pressure to stop all logging and transfer State Forests into National Parks there looks to be little point.

Access for HGVs, buses, taxies etc etc... Are these all to be stated?
The access=no means no access unless there is a following dedicated tag .. such as in this case foot=yes, bicycle=yes and motor_vehicle=private (to allow NP service vehicles) ...

Hi,

Is this route signposted?
Most of the route looks to be on paved roads with no cycling infrastructure.

Hi,
The tracks in the Blue Mts National Park would allow access to parks maintenance and fire vehicles. So might be better tagged access=no, motorvehicle=private, and some foot=yes, bicycle=yes.

Hi
I have moved the ConocoPhillips Australia office across the road to a building with the same name. node/2353502584.

Opps..
Failed to edit comment and source.
Source bing.
Comment
Changeset: 164103412

Australia, WA, South Dwellingup. Add more mining hall roads and a conveyor belt.

Ops .. forgot the + ...
thanks.

Not been there yet, hopefully Sept this year. I usually check OSM areas that I look to visit so I can improve the map as much as possible before a visit. Then take notes during the visit.
I am trying to get some consistency across the Munda Biddi campsites.
Basicity I think the tourism=campsite should contain the hut, toilets, water, bicycle parking and tent pitches. The sites here would be tagged as pitches .. as per the OSMwiki and what has been done at another Munda Biddi site.
On the visit I hope to detail track surfaces and camp site approach trails as access=private, bicycle=yes. + anything else I think of.
Any thoughts?

Hi,
Are these 2 camp sites part of the Yarri camp site for the Munda Biddi?

Thanks for this, much better than those intersecting areas.

Hi,
Strictly speaking campsites (and other facilities like toilets etc) are not 'alternatives'. Probably best in a new relation .. 'facilities'??

Anyway I'm looking at doing this in Sept, so tidying up the near camp grounds and will probably look at supermarkets and general stores along the way. Probably fill in some of the trail surfaces, generally just paved and unpaved unless an associated way has a more detailed tag and it looks the same.

Regards.

Ghan route repaired -
gap in ways (Alice Springs)
route not adjacent to platform.. (Darwin)

The rules are not only country dependant but, in at least some cases' state dependant. Further there are exceptions smaller area exception - for example a beach may have the local council boundary extend out to sea to manage sand banks.

I think you should contact locall mappers before doing these kind of changes.

Why?
Consider the following?

1) OSm maps the coast line at the high tide level

2) local councils control the land/sea between the high tide to low tide levels (ref Local Government Act 1993)

Think you may want to have a look at changeset/158327734???

Part revert to restore non crossing of ways.