OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
146742567 almost 2 years ago

Hi,Please use the lifestyle prefix for demolished... see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay

146801040 almost 2 years ago

Relation 3423234 - bus route 549 from Parramatta still has ways out of sequence. I have not checked the stops.

relation/3423235 546 from Parramatta is of for ways in sequence.

146732313 almost 2 years ago

Relation deleted.

118898419 almost 2 years ago

Hi,

The OSM guide is 'one feature=one OSM entry" So the single 'social facility' is one entry on the property boundary - the individual buildings within the boundary do not get the same tags.

Next addr:street is for the name of the street not the complete address including the number, post code etc.

This has been corrected.

146732049 almost 2 years ago

Hi
Realtionships should not carry the same tags as the members ...
So building=apartments on the ways should not appear within the relation ...
This error has been corrected.

146767837 almost 2 years ago

The same comment applies to bus route 3423234 bus route 549...

146767837 almost 2 years ago

relation/3423235 - 546 bus route is once again broken. The only mapper making the changes that broke the route is you.

Will you please fix it so you can learn how not to brake these Public Transport version 2 routes???

See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.02734&lat=-33.77448&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

@Warin61/diary/45106

146775056 almost 2 years ago

Hi
Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments... For more information see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

146730079 almost 2 years ago

Hi,
The multipolygon relation is not 'correct'. The role 'inner' cannot touch a role 'outer'.

To me it looks like the red roof is one building ... then the other structure is ??? For the moment I have used the same tags on both, building=school, building:levels=2

You can check the osmwiki to see how tags are used - see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

146731774 almost 2 years ago

Same comment on this relation.

Hints:
Your probably reading this via some email message ... so
You can view the changeset on changeset/146731774
That gives you all the ways, relations and nodes that were entered or changed .. so you can see then there.
Then you can click on them to see each one .. such as the relation
relation/17086425

And so on for each thing.

For information on tags and relations the osmwiki is a reasonable guide. See
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Multipolygon_created_by_only_one_polygon
Note: engage brain, the wiki reflects the view of the person who last edited it, may not be a consensus view .. if you have concerns see the discussion page - top left provides a link to it on all the osmwiki pages.

Keep mapping.

146732313 almost 2 years ago

The relation only has inners...

Suggest delete the relation!

Note: state, country and suburb add information can be obtained by renders from already entered data. There is no need to include it on everything.

146731937 almost 2 years ago

The relation excludes the buildings from the nursing home... Why?

144359808 almost 2 years ago

One member relations are redundant.

Clark Island relation has been deleted for the above reason.

146653968 almost 2 years ago

Hi,

Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments.
relation/17077151 has been deleted. What were the outers for this deleted relation have been tagged as buildings as per the deleted relation.

146583429 almost 2 years ago

I can find no parking area with the tag ref=PER other than the ones you created. Have they been deleted? Ther are 2 of these left..

Relation: 17066857
Edited at: 2024-01-22T19:48:15Z
In changeset: 146567294

And
Relation: 17066856
Data Set: 5965853e
Edited at: 2024-01-22T19:48:15Z
In changeset: 146567294
A 2 member relation - looks to be a poor duplicate of above relation/17066857

Example of duplicated ways:

Way: 1241751958 from changeset: 146527486 created 2024-01-21T20:44:59Z has no tags
Used as an inner in relation 17069273 changeset/146583429 (this one)

Duplicated by Way: 1241751959
Created at: 2024-01-21T20:44:59Z
In changeset: 146527486
with tag highway=pedestrian ...

146589172 almost 2 years ago

From the link I gave says

"Errorneous ways
rel_id 2666822
from Sydney
to Canberra
ref 631-636
name Canberra Xplorer
route train
way_id 1242188200
node_id 1577647710
error gap"

Examining the sequence of ways in JOSM they are not is sequence between way/285071338 and Way: 144184406. There are several sequences that need changing.

This also brakes

India Pacific relation/3134294 - gap.

Northshore & Western line relation/9806974 gap

Gap between Way: 904363665 and Way: 145390717

and possibly others, the QA tool only catches so many before it moves on. There are some 20 relations in this changeset that were altered, not all of them are Public Transport version 2.

146589172 almost 2 years ago

Opps - Canberra Explorer

146589172 almost 2 years ago

Gaps or unordered ways on Canberra Express route -
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.19704&lat=-33.89722&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

146583429 almost 2 years ago

Hi
The ref=PER is the code for the airport, not individual parking areas, buildings nor anything else.

Assess = yes is the default and is layer=0 .. adding them is simply data bloat.

5 parking area relations have been deleted as duplications.

There are at least some 16 ways with the same positions, 8 of those could be removed.

146516818 almost 2 years ago

HI,
Hint - to make the building corners 'square' press the letter 'Q' while the building is selected.