The is this really a 'house number' or is it a 'lot number'? Might be better to use addr:full?

Hi
This adds a house number but without a street name. Without the street name it may make 'navigation' difficult.

relation/16698618 and 16698619 are wrong.
The outer ways cannot share segments.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=136.76799&lat=-12.19510&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Hi
What is the source of this population?

... I see ... update to new road ... Esri imagery would be the imagery to use. I have fixed the buss route and separated the joining roads so they can be used in route relations..

Arr... it becomes Sir Reginald Ansett Drive once through the intersection.

O'Riordan Street south bound ... just to clarify

I take it there is no longer any way to go from Qantus Drive east bound to O'Riordan Street as you have removed the right turn lanes and there is a turn restriction in place. This means the bus route T-Bus Terminal Transfer can no longer run...

????????

Hi,
Nodes 10233008384 and 10233008383 restored to previous position. Parking was otherwise out of kilter.

Relations
14496632, v3
14496634, v3
14496635, v3
14496636, v3
14496637, v3
14496638, v3
14496639, v3
deleted. All one member role inner...

Hi
way/1222365541 is wrong.
See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.12122&lat=-35.24394&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Where a feature has a hole inside it a multi polygonrelation should be used .. see
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

However, looking at the imagery some of the 'building' looks like a covered walk way and could be better mapped as a highway=footway, covered=yes.

Hi,
Construction relation/16622825 deleted as the outer ways shared segments. Retagged ways with 'landuse=construction' - this is simpler and easier to edit in future.

Deleted relation...

Hi,
Ritches IGA relation is wrong. Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.96378&lat=-35.52714&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I would simply map the outside of the whole thing .. no need to divide it up into two bits.

The same error has been made in two other relations - See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.95456&lat=-35.53222&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

What is the purpose of the relation? To group things together that carry the same street name?... but his relation only has streets .. not addresses in it. It also contains parts of a roundabout ..
The addresses along the street already contain the street information ..

The relation looks to me to be redundant as all the information, and more, is already in the data base.

Hi
There is an error on way/822372606 addr:street=cton Drive ? A fair way from Action Drive...

reverted

Hi
The import has Ramsay Road, yet OSM has the road named Ramsay Street...

There are a number of similar discrepancies. I am inclined to trust the road names as they are displayed on maps. What say you?

Hi,
Here there is addr:street=Turubul Crescent ... but the road is named Turubul Court ... which is it?

Hi
Here is Ospray Lane while addr:street has Osprey Lane..

Which is it?