Relation: 6585065 is a simple way .. does not need to be a relation. And it carries no information as to what it is .. And it crosses over itself.
I have made it a single way/442374458, made the boundaries from the LPI Base Map and tagged it a park. Please review my work here and make any changes that reflect what is there.

No response for 3 months ...no mapping activity to connect unconnected paths ... leaving it this way is not good.

So I may as well add things that were deleted ... unless you respond real soon?

I had a look for power lines ... they are very hard to see on imagery .. none in OSM itself. The LPI Imagery shows some of that area clear of trees .. and even then I cannot see them... Don't know how .. they don't stand out with the standard rendering so would be easy to miss that way. I only notice them when I am editing the roads.

You have a number of nodes at the ends of tracks with tower=power source=bing ...
I cannot see anything there .. not even with the better LPI Imagery. deleted these as I came across them. e.g. Node: 2555269081

You have a node named 'Gate 13' ... but there is no physical object tagged ... like barrier=gate .. and it would be best as part of a barrier=wall ...

The storm water drains into Terrys Creek .. but is in NOT part of the creek itself.

Note Terrys Creek is also used as the Ryde City administrative boundary. Changing the creek changes the boundary.

Suggest you add a drain or creek from your storm water to Terrys Creek .. but don't extend the creek.

What sport/s is/are played here?
The rendered area looks to be several pitches.
Bing imagery shows construction and buildings in this area.

Kenley Park contains areas of grass .. removed tagging for wood.
Florence Cottan Park changed to LPI boundaries
Delected way/435725409 as this contains houses too.
way/144343003 reduced to exclude houses.

highway=footway excludes motor vehicles by default no need to tag motorvehicle=no.

Way 435727141 is part of a relation .. this way should not carry tags, it is the relation that should carry the tags.

Deciduous ??? really! .. Evergreen is what is there.

Another .. not a culvert but a bridge.

Hi,
The Epping platform (5+ 6) is not wide enough - does not line up with my recollections of the lifts at their above ground locations.. I'll do a survey when I can. But i think this may be better as 2 separate platforms as they are separated by walls at this station.

The 'Epping Station Concourse' begins and ends outside the 'building' .. so it is not a corridor. Retagged footway, tunnel=building_passage.

You clearly have not looked.
The stream there is not the boundary.

Go on ... look at these nodes ... !

Visible there .. but not the same location.
At the given locations ... not visible!

https://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/arcgis/rest/services/public/NSW_Base_Map/MapServer/tile/18/155240/241315

Not visible!

https://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/arcgis/rest/services/public/NSW_Base_Map/MapServer/tile/18/155255/241307

Not visible!

Have a look at the actual locations given ... not on the LPI base map ...

1) This boundary is between 2 state forests - so the colour is the same for both sides on the LPI Base Map
2) there is no faint grey or any other coloured line here on the LPI Base Map.

Therefore the source in not the LPI Base Map.

Humm yes correctly aligned to the "LPI admin boundaries - state forests" but not shown on the LPI Base Map .. so the source is wrong and means it cannot be verified using the sated source.

The following nodes do not appear on the LPI Base amp;
4094553049
4094553050
4094553051
4094553086
4094553087
4094553088
4094553189

These have all been put on way Way: 387068735 that I originally added. I am concerned as to how many other ways you may have similarly added/modified data that may now be incorrect.

node/4438854071 is not a ford .. there is a bridge here as per LPI Base Map.
node/4438854852 looks to be a culvert.

Perhaps all theses should be left for a survey!!

I am adding a few tracks in the Bargo State Forest. way/285828624 - part of the Hume & Hovel ... looks to be a little off the LPI Base map location? So my question is .. what is your source for the entry .. and should I replace it with the LIP data?

The relation you added has no information. Deleted.