I have added the cricket. However the other sports are not obvious to me ..

See
way/1090733814
way/1185627654

I prefer individual mapping as that shows the individual sports are present.

Added netball - way/1185627656

Hi
The 'landuse=grass' is actually an AFL pitch. Corrected.

Hi,

There are OSM problems with that relation.
See the QA tool https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.52990&lat=-34.65386&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Seethe OSM wiki osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

This looks very confused! The name is used multiple times... would this not be a single 'place' with the name? OSM guide says 'one feature = one OSM entry' I'd map an outer way with the name and a place=something tag. Then map the commercial etc landuses without a name... Hope that helps.

Hi,
The change to Wheeny Ck leads to changes to the following admin boundaries;
Sydney
Wheeny Ck
Kurrajong Hills
Kurrajong Heights
Kurrajong
Grose Vale

Hi,

Some of these waterways are used as admin boundaries.
Would it be better if the 2 features were entered as separate ways?

Hi,
This changeset was partially reverted to restore admin boundaries of Darwin Harbour, The Gardens and Larrakeya. These are sourced for Government data .. not imagery.

I have deleted the relation - all the buildings are part of the landuse= religious ...
The outer way/1184883535 already has landuse religious and address details.

This also removes the house number 15.

Hi,
The property has the house number of 49 to 57, Wade St. That can be confirmed by looking at the DCS Base Map ... with some 'interpretation'.
What is the source of house number 15??? And what street is it?

Errr ...

1) multipolygon relations cannot share outer way segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.22194&lat=-33.87452&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

2 the building tag should have only one value. So building=yes;hotel is wrong.

3 The hotel covers more that what you have mapped. It would be best mapped using building:part tagging.

Hi,

Razed is used to stop people mapping things that no longer exist. If the objects are no longer on imagery then the razed objects can be deleted from OSM.
"Avoid mapping former railways if it is impossible to determine the former route from the ground or aerial imagery. "
railway=razed

Hi,

There is an error in relation 15985553. The outer way touches the inner way. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=137.66508&lat=-34.79486&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

PS nice to map some of the rural areas of OZ.

Hi,

Why break the roundabout (way/170503250 is part of it) into segments??? Each segment has exactly the same tags...

I have restored it back to one entry.

You are going to have to;

read the error given by that tool

follow the previous example if relevant

look on the OSM wiki page for multipolygon relations and fine the error.

Takes time. But you learn more that way than being lead by me.

Marmion Avenue:

oneway=yes

with
lanes:forward=1
lanes:backward=1

That makes no sense. Needs fixing

There are now some 5 relatons with errors in this area...
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.03058&lat=-39.85133&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,

The addition of state, postcode and suburb are all redundant information! Do not waste your time adding it. The information can be obtained by software from OSM data already loaded - admin boundaries and post code boundaries...

These are in Victoria.. the DCS stuff is NSW only.

What is the source of this information?!

HI,
This one I'll leave you to fix.

The Chinese cemetery sector is part of the cemetery - so no relation is required.

Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.32810&lat=-34.54313&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi
The cemetery sectors are part of the cemetery. So these are not 'inners', making the relation having only one member .. so it can be mapped as a simple closed way.

Hi,

Adding 'maxspeed' while there are maxspeed:forward and maxspeed:backward ... makes no sense

I am removing the maxspeed tag where there is this conflict.