OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
136720671 over 2 years ago

Hi,
The relation changed does not cover that section of river.
See relation/14728907#map=15/-33.3051/115.7058

And see way/13653235#map=15/-33.2950/115.7249

If you want change the relation outer way to include sections of way/13653235.

Note The editor Id does not handle relations well, JOSM does a better job - it is a more complex editor.

136999382 over 2 years ago

Hi

Woowookarung Regional Park has

3 ways - one of them closed.
1 relation - with all the above ways.

It is appropriately mapped by the single closed way. I have removed the others as redundant.

136807485 over 2 years ago

Looks good to me.

136819416 over 2 years ago

North Coast Line and Sydney XPT route relations corrected for sequential way order....

124801855 over 2 years ago

The TOC Manual is STILL not correctly listed on the data base!

I think it is time to remove the data from OSM.

Additionally where maxspeed:backward and maxspeed:forward are the same maxspeed should be used.

136807485 over 2 years ago

No.
Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share the same segments.

If they are 2 seperate buildings then they's usuall have 2 addresses e.g. 8a and 8b. However as they both have the same name (Duetto) I'd take them as the same building .. just with one section having a different height - see building:part for information.

I leave you to fix this.. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.24103&lat=-33.87661&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

136690394 over 2 years ago

I came arccos it in a similar manner. I still keep my eye on it to check for my errors.

124164202 over 2 years ago

Ken Done gallery restored tag as tourism=gallery ... but removed it from the building and now is a simple node.

136690394 over 2 years ago

If you had looked at the tool I referenced in the first post you would have seen it. For your information:

relation/15916710/history
1) outer way way/1177206588#map=15/-39.7715/143.8731 has the same tags as the relation

2) Way way/1177206589#map=19/-39.77392/143.87128 is tagged in the relation as an outer when if fact it is an inner...

I suggest you keep an eye on the tool I referenced in my first comment to see if you make any similar errors.

136690394 over 2 years ago

The relation was in error. The error has been repeated by you in other changesets. You will continue to make this same error until you recognise it.

Do you now want to look at the error and fix it? By fixing it you may learn how to avoid repeating it?

136690394 over 2 years ago

Deleted.
So too have other faulty relations of yours in this area.

134755231 over 2 years ago

Humm... the issue is that some bus routes use that buss off ramp ... presumably they go around the construction ... in that pdf it says
"Access will be maintained via the Falcon Street and Miller Street off ramps."
Maybe there are only taking the area between the bus off ramp and the expressway? Looks to me like the lane otherwise the buses would stop.

136690394 over 2 years ago

Hi,
Error in relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.87116&lat=-39.77136&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

134755231 over 2 years ago

Bing shows the Falcon St Offramp as a bus lane ..Not under construction... The DCS Base Map maybe more upto date. The Maxar imagery is more upto date.

132233217 over 2 years ago

Hi,
Regarding the fixme placed for a left turn from York St to Margret St... Margret St is one way preventing travel in that direction ..so a turn restriction would be redundant.

135218031 over 2 years ago

Ok. I think I have this relation corrected now. Note there was an offset from the roads in the same area - I have corrected that to be the same as the roads already mapped ...

135218031 over 2 years ago

Hi,
Relation 15752535 is wrong. Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments....
See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.71137&lat=-32.53851&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Overlapping,_unclosed_member_ways_belonging_to_the_same_role

The changeset comments could be better - see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

134435383 over 2 years ago

No response at all... deleted. Ways are still there - tag them.

133908451 over 2 years ago

Hi,
Relation 15623238, bus route 238: Taronga Zoo Wharf to Balmoral Beach is wrong. It has no bus stops - as least 2 are required for Public Transport Version 2 compliance, one at the start and one at the finish.

136567411 over 2 years ago

Hi
The relation/10603708 is for water not a 'meadow'. The 'meadow' also includes houses and trees. I have reverted this relation back to the previous water entry - 2 members only.

This removes the meadow entry. Suggestion? Map smaller areas as individual meadows - use the roads as barriers not to map meadows over. So there would be at least 3 outers.