The changeset comment dose not reflect what took place. Please use changeset comments that reflect the actual changes...

The coastline is not the national park boundary.

In OSM the coastline is the hi water level...

Name removed from tree relation.

Forest in Australia is taken to be productive use e.g. using trees to produce lumber. The area looks to be natural=wood ... changed.

bear rock relation deleted - better as simple ways.

I do not use Id! You will have to find it in the iD editor information.
I use JOSM. I chose that as it is the more complex editor - able to do more things than iD .. thus I only learnt one editor not 2 or 3 or 4 .. just JOSM.

This relation is still incorrect!

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.66725&lat=-38.01783&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,

The Mosque ...
Way: 957793571 building:part=yes ... umm would that not be part of the roof? If so building:part=roof? And also the location would be in the center of the building?

Simply changing the tag 'public_transport:version=1' to 'public_transport:version=2' is not enough to make these PTv2.

Hi,
I have restored relation/7079456 add parts of this changeset to that relation.

Try to work with the existing tree relations rather than making new ones.

relation/15571536 - water - has he roles 'inner' and 'outer' wrong.

Please look at it and fix it.

This error remains... The roles 'inner' and 'outer' are mixed up in relation/15406000

Adding the PTv2 tag to a relation does not make the relation compatible with PTv2 requirements.

Hi,
This route does not meet the requirements for a Public Transport Route version 2 ... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=144.76857&lat=-37.97780&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Hi,

This building has a problem..
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.06917&lat=-34.01403&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Don't know.

One error visible here - site updates about every day and comes up with more slowly
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.83510&lat=-32.06858&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Other QA tools ..
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=-33.88489&lon=151.1875&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C70%2C120%2C380&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=-33.88489&lon=151.1875&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C70%2C120%2C380&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1

------------
I am not an ID user so I cannot help you with that editor.

YOU can see the problem for the next few hours on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.20206&lat=-42.53316&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,
Ar a node was deleted by you in changeset/133653203. This fixed the problem.

You do need to work on those errors/warnings.

In this area JOSM validator reports some 16 errors and 121 warnings...

Errors (16)
Duplicated ways (1)
Highway duplicated nodes (10)
Multipolygon is not closed (1)
Multipolygon ring contains segment twice (3)
Overlapping highways (1)
Warnings (121)
area on a relation (1)
Crossing building/highway (7)
Crossing highways (60)
highway=footway together with foot=no (1)
highway=footway together with maxspeed=40 (1)
missing tag - man_made=tower without tower:type (1)
Mixed type duplicated nodes (23)
node connects highway and building (3)
Route scheme is unspecified. Add public_transport:version (2=public_transport; 1=legacy) (1)
Self-intersecting polygon ring (1)
Unconnected nodes without physical tags - No tags (2)
Unnamed ways (12)
Way end node near other highway (8)

Hi,

relation/15577991 does not make sense? natural=wood;heath err no. It is either heath or wood. And both members are 'outers' yet one is inside the other.
Looks to me like way/1152292927 should be tagged natural=wood (as it was before this changeset) and then have the role 'inner' in the relation. The relation should be tagged natural=heath

See what you think.

Hi,
Golf is a problem in OSM...

Relation 14005754 - "self intersects" where grass crosses the sand bunker

Other 'golf problems' can be found on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.84688&lat=-39.89667&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,
The JOSM validator would have issued the warning message "crossing ways' ...There is only one, way/435781531. Would you please look at it and correct it?