no worries, thks!

can you please adjust your comments next time? This is Punaauia...

I can tell you that i updated the whole network from Mahina to Punaauia, from official data... (which i corrected when needed) and so if you changed something there (which seems to be the case) easiest thing is to revert everything (likely that i did better because i live here..) and then take road by road and ask me where you think it should be improved.

(meaning in tahiti)

Please do it to all the other ones too. It's the same issue....

see : changeset/76411840

Please STOP reverting our valuable edits and answer to my changeset comment!!!

BTW, hope this will help you : to avoid this mistake in the future, solution is to check history of the element before doing changes... ;)

Hello trigeo, Please be carefull and take care of our work here in Tahiti.
Road classification has been thought through with institutional services. We shared it on the wiki. We are on the ground. Priority is for people on site in OSM (and your firm too). So please contact us prior to any change, where you can notice we have been doing some work, if you think there is something that could be better... FYI secondary roads are so because they are major axis, and lead to services or industries.
Please don't change something if you are not sure about it, and not a third time... changeset/74595606#map=19/-17.53737/-149.56777
Hope you understand and you will help us to make the map better in the future.

Hello trigeo, Why did you change it to a service road? I live here and this is a pedestrian road. Please keep up supporting us. Thanks.

* those roads n France have not moved or been edited.. just the changeset attributes have applied to it, which they don't need to.

Yes, my mistake sorry about that. See: changeset/74936824. I will undo changes made on the few roads of Arue in France that where not supposed to be concerned by this. Still I don't want to edit the whole changeset as it is a part of a serie and the issue is only on a few roads in Arue, France.

Yes of course! actually it was supposed to be only on a small surrounding in Tahiti, my mistake. I initially worked on an extract based on location (in JOSM), which didnt work well. Which is why this area is so big. Still it's part of a testing part of the import so this should not happen anymore. Thanks for noticing it!!

Hello et merci pour ton feedback! C'est vrai que ce serait mieux de mettre du wheelchair:description à la place du wheelchair:description:fr pour les apps... J'avais hésité par résistance probablement (aha)... je vais modifier ;) Bref.
Sinon pour le tag barrier : es ce qu'un tag explicite pour la barrière en question ne serait pas mieux? Tu penses que si ce n'est pas dans barrier=*, le calculateur d'itinéraire ne le prendra pas en compte? J'imaginais que si à vrai dire...
Et sinon j'aurais plutôt tendance à rajouter des valeurs dans barrier, spécifique à l'obstacle plutôt que mettre quelque chose de générique, soit qqc du genre barrier=tree, brarrier=traffic_signals...
Merci encore,
A bientôt
Violaine

Hey, yes i wanted to correct it tomorrow, you found it before ! This changeset has to be reversed. I stopped the upload in the middle because realised it was going to upload wrong layer. So nothing from this changeset needs to be kept. If you have time to do it today, it would be the Best, else i'm back at my computer tomorrow. Thanks ! Violaine

Bonjour Yvanna, Il semblerait que vous ayez fait une grosse erreur de manip', je vous invite à revoir la zone et corriger vos erreurs. Merci, Violaine

So much thanks! Good night too :)

It should not, it's just a dataset which was unwanted, but the datas i wanted to import into OSM are in fact there, so you can find doubles... So no modifications on this changeset...

Hi Oliver, Sorry i thought you spoke french with the 'merci'. So I want to delete all the changeset/41689888 as it was an unwanted importation, i did a mistake and didnt want to upload these datas. Or i can do it manually in JOSM. Would it be right if i charge the xml change file (in osc) in josm and delete all the information, then upload changes into OSM? Thks

Bonjour ! J'ai en effet fait une boulette, que j'ai remarqué et corrigé localement, je n'avais par contre pas remarqué qu'elle concernait tout le changeset. Ce qu'il faudrait faire serait de supprimer les éléments envoyés du changeset/41689888. J'avais bien fait la transfo en tag OSM et veillé à ne pas écraser d'infos existantes, donc les informations qui resterons seront les bonnes. J'ai bien vu l'outils reverter dans JOSM, est-ce l'outils à utiliser dans ce cas-là? Dsl pour le dérangement, j'ai eu un loupé dans la manip'... Violaine