VictorIE's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 100547971 | over 4 years ago | Please stop disconnecting driveways from other roads. OSM and routing software depends on routes being joined up. |
| 102687020 | over 4 years ago | It is open for bikes and pedestrians, but there is a mostly built road there. Not a lot of imagery available, so I'm expecting a fair bit of reworking anyway. |
| 80447152 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Did you do a GPS trace for the New Ross Bypass? If not, the guesstimates are very good. There are photos for about 80% of it now. |
| 102650063 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Does the R407 now go via Millennium Link Road? |
| 101878117 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Yes, I fixed this one and about 5 others around the country. I made one of the mistakes myself. :) I do maintenance of the Logainm tags. Both OSM and Logainm are active projects, that are expanding all the time. OSM has about 50,000 objects tagged with logainm:ref=* and logainm:url=* There are about 120,000 objects on Logainm, although there are about 1% duplicates there. They have at least 20,000 more to document and OSM is adding to that list. Most name=* tags in this area are in Irish as it is a designated Gaeltacht area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaeltacht We try to add name=*, name:en=* and name:ga=* for every location in Ireland. There are some objects with other languages also. A few years ago there was a large project to map every place name in Ireland that led to https://www.townlands.ie/ I think this used at least some automation. The problem is where two or more locations have the same name. Sometimes dozens of locations share a name. |
| 101878117 | over 4 years ago | Hi, relation/6205189#map=15/52.2095/-10.3223 Just be careful with Logainm. Civil parishes and townlands with the same name have different reference numbers, but are often presented on the same page. |
| 102280615 | over 4 years ago | Hi, There is an odd tag here node/8592826761#map=15/51.9170/-8.6072 Should it be railway:abandoned=platform or similar? |
| 37204950 | over 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 33815443 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Are wee sur this is Old Blarney Road? way/369251965/history - it doesn't go all the way to Blarney. I would have called (before the New Mallow Road) the parallel road to the north the Blarney Road. |
| 101139405 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Just be careful in dragging nodes out of position node/1435757949#map=19/51.90021/-8.40177&layers=N |
| 101820281 | over 4 years ago | Hi, When splitting up terraced houses / pairs of semi-Ds, be careful to delete duplicated buildings. :) |
| 101140803 | almost 5 years ago | lol. After I had "fixed it" again, I had hit refresh several times and it wouldn't show properly. |
| 101014103 | almost 5 years ago | Well spotted, thank you! |
| 96680767 | almost 5 years ago | Hi When mapping a path along the side of a road, it is a special case. Instead of just highway=footway, highway=footway and footway=sidewalk should be used. Otherwise the implication is that it is, for example a pedestrian lane or path across a green space or the like. You might have a look at highway=footway Be careful in adding access=no, as it suggests nothing is allowed access it, e.g. there is sinkhole or minefield. While foot=designated creates an except to the access=no, it might create a conflict with some route planners. osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Tag:access%3Ddesignated&uselang=en-GB |
| 75469039 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, this looks like a relation gone wrong. relation/8064782 |
| 90076176 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, relation/11554498
These two are both tagged amenity=townhall. Would you know which is correct? |
| 18793403 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, It's old, but you have access=one way / two way Should it be one-way northbound? |
| 66641015 | almost 5 years ago | Will send you a message. |
| 99849013 | almost 5 years ago | There's no 'wrong way' to do things, just certain things that make things complicated and ambiguous. One thing is that we are mapping using lines (ways) of objects that have areas. The piece of footway on the traffic island and the roadway were one on top of the other on Templeogue Road and Templeville Road, so I just moved a single node on each. If you take a look at this junction osm.org/#map=19/53.32173/-6.26628 each traffic island and flow of traffic is given it's own way, which is probably over-mapping the junction. |
| 98595996 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Does this section of road actually exist? way/40798427 |