VictorIE's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
101014103	almost 5 years ago	Well spotted, thank you!
96680767	almost 5 years ago	Hi way/889392926 When mapping a path along the side of a road, it is a special case. Instead of just highway=footway, highway=footway and footway=sidewalk should be used. Otherwise the implication is that it is, for example a pedestrian lane or path across a green space or the like. You might have a look at highway=footway Be careful in adding access=no, as it suggests nothing is allowed access it, e.g. there is sinkhole or minefield. While foot=designated creates an except to the access=no, it might create a conflict with some route planners. osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Tag:access%3Ddesignated&uselang=en-GB
75469039	almost 5 years ago	Hi, this looks like a relation gone wrong. relation/8064782
90076176	almost 5 years ago	Hi, relation/11554498 way/757697140 These two are both tagged amenity=townhall. Would you know which is correct?
18793403	almost 5 years ago	Hi, way/245265035 It's old, but you have access=one way / two way Should it be one-way northbound?
66641015	almost 5 years ago	Will send you a message.
99849013	almost 5 years ago	There's no 'wrong way' to do things, just certain things that make things complicated and ambiguous. One thing is that we are mapping using lines (ways) of objects that have areas. The piece of footway on the traffic island and the roadway were one on top of the other on Templeogue Road and Templeville Road, so I just moved a single node on each. If you take a look at this junction osm.org/#map=19/53.32173/-6.26628 each traffic island and flow of traffic is given it's own way, which is probably over-mapping the junction.
98595996	almost 5 years ago	Hi, Does this section of road actually exist? way/40798427
95906087	almost 5 years ago	Talking to another user, he thinks I've been wrong on accepting the advice of the iD Checker and they have raised the issue with the Checker manager. We had unwittingly been engaged in an edit war for almost a year. :D
96187998	almost 5 years ago	\o/ Yay!
96187998	almost 5 years ago	Hi, I had no idea we were engaged in an edit war about Tesco Express. :)
97074854	almost 5 years ago	Hi, node/8298371070#map=19/53.31422/-6.20340 Could I just check. This substation. How big is it? Would it be somewhere around the size of car, a domestic garage or a house? Did you see any markings like "Elm Park 38kV" or "748721X"? Thank you
96851861	almost 5 years ago	Hi, way/891540415 way/310289955 You have marked this as private. However, there are 5-7 houses on it. This would seem to be an inconsistency.
94985211	almost 5 years ago	Hi Could you check the tagging here: way/720914899 ?
74475768	almost 5 years ago	Hi, node/3741027937 Would this be better as amenity=social_facility ?
96529797	almost 5 years ago	Hi, node/320226836#map=17/54.92837/-7.19628 This is showing as a 'near junction'. Is it still usuable?
52909988	almost 5 years ago	Hi, This stream way/330947442#map=16/52.8349/-6.9750 and adjacent ways have the tag FIXME=Incomplete Can this be removed?
95697205	about 5 years ago	Hi, Welcome to OSM. I see that you have been making quite a few changes. It might be better to restrict change sets ('saves') to smaller geographic areas and/or single topics. Could I ask what this line represents? osm.org/edit?way=773119702
95775821	about 5 years ago	Duplicate deleted.
85978025	about 5 years ago	It is consistent with the wikipedia page, which has a photo. It's in the style of a tower house. Appears to have modern renovations. Note shadow is much longer than adjacent houses. As to whether it is a tower or a castle is arguable. I think it's more than a tower.