Strange. :) Should the attached lines also be listed as zero?

way/671851093

voltage=0 and frequency=0?

Should this: way/670782751 be a boundary only?

These ways:
way/670881742
way/670881741
duplicate this one: way/23405106

Typo. Fixed.

Thank you!

It's here: way/517263748

Hi,

It seems that An Post no longer operate from here: way/666647552

I don't use JOSM, so I don't know what might have caused it. Might the edits have been saved twice?

The only reason I spotted it was because there was a duplicate node on one house. This seems to happen when a computer mouse has a 'moment'

Lots of duplicate buildings in this changeset.

Is this lane: way/659835361 blocked by garages at the east end?

This section of railway way/268317775 is marked as railway=disused, which suggests the rails are still in place, is this correct?

If there is nothing present, it should be marked as railway=abandoned.

Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

You might look at the values here: railway=* when drawing railways. Realise that if you use, e.g. railway=rail instead of railway=abandoned, that abandoned lines will show as if they are current, which is misleading.

I don't think rail=proposed is recognised, but in using such a tag, that the proposal needs to have solid backing, e.g. by a railway undertaking or local council development plan.

There are quite a few farm tracks marked here, e.g.

way/642694665
way/642694666
way/642694672

These seem to be field boundaries, not tracks.

Should this be a power pole? node/6088250610

Hi,

I see that you have mapped lots of highway=track in this area. However, all I can see in the aerial photos are stone walls of fields.

A track should look something like the track in the photo here: highway=track

If it is for pedestrians only, like this: highway=path it should be marked highway=path

"or even how they got created in the first place" - I know that feeling. :)

I think they're all deleted now.

Similar cluster here: node/3626823708#map=17/52.56603/-9.35515

Hi, Some untagged nodes here: node/3626823713 - they approximate the boundary line. Can they be deleted?

Hi,

There are lots of untagged nodes in this area, e.g. node/5823532777 Do these represent something?

I fixed a 'Self-intersecting way' here: way/646401420#map=15/51.9614/-10.2090

If you tag the ways with:
highway=cycleway and
proposed=yes

It will show as a proposed cycleway on the standard view.