Forgot to mention: the relation also needs type=multipolygon. Example: relation/6723248

If I can elaborate... Create a relation, containing all 5 ponds as outer members. Tags (name etc.) go on relation only, not on member ways (remove those), so tags are recorded only once, and rendered only once.

Add the two islets as inner members, and they'll un-disappear. And I'd double-check spelling of that islet. Cheers.

Oops. Part of previous changeset (the "simplify" stuff) got mixed in with this one, probably because the server conked out partway during the previous upload. It all seems fine though.

It was already mapped.
way/129894734
Now there are two.

Look closely.

PS, OSM supports multiple names, useful for searching. Eg old_name, alt_name, official_name, etc. (There's no official name according to CanVec, BTW).

name=*

Hi. Thank you for clarifying. Had you included this info when you made the change (source), I'd have left it alone.

Given that the previous name in OSM was Japanese-sounding (also unattributed), it was easy to assume this renaming was a quick derogatory shot.

I already removed the name (since no attribution was given for any of the names it's had), but you're welcome to add it again, with attribution. That'll discourage others from changing it. I won't get involved (further, argh) in name wars... Cheers.

Hi. You changed a peak name to "Jap Mountain". Where does this name come from?

What is the name:: suffix for that?

If doing multiple languages, you'd want:
name::cr (assuming Cree)
name:en (English),
name (local name by convention, may include both.)

Hi hoserab.
Are you sure about this? It was closed as an airfield years ago, now being used for other purposes. (Wikipedia says, used only for helicopters, and they don't taxi.) Cheers. :)

I fixed it.

Hi JetCat.

You deleted two multipolygon relations, effectively removing a large area of wood (1) and forest (1).

Please revert this changeset, or rebuild the polygons manually.

No biggie. I can put it back. It's not like any maps actually render it... until it's built. :)

Hi. Any reason for deleting aerialway=proposed? Glitch?

Hi sonik90.

Assuming that's a typical mountaineering route, may I suggest adding "trail_visibility=no" (or as appropriate) to the path?

Some maps will render that as, say, a dotted line, rather than something more substantial.

Thanks for catching the Rig Street closure at the bridge. I'd heard something about that, and decided to trust the auto-router when it said, go another way. Saved me some driving, and I found a nice camping spot on the detour. :)

Thanks. Sorry, I get grumpy sometimes if I find my work has undone.

Here's what it looked like before it crumbled away some more.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/gs-geo-images/823e1a40-25a3-4e3b-b1b9-0d3229c8d790_l.jpg

Wrong. The road was split by the river, a washout not worth the trouble to repair.

I was there. You weren't.

Version 5 looked the most correct. man_made=pier, waterway=fuel. (I never knew about the latter.)

No. Try man_made=pier instead.
osm.wiki/Tag:man made=pier