Hi andrefantin,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Does park really exists here way/52100500 . Can you verify it?

Best,

Upendra.

Hello e_soares_jr,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added the park tag to the node. We already have the polygon tagged as park with same name. You can go ahead and delete the node.

Best,

Upendra.

Hi WWillow,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you recheck the tags you added here way/34912979/history#map=19/52.37049/4.86228 you gave landuse = recreation_ground twice.

Regards,

Upendra

Hi J50BA100,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added park tag to the node. According to the bing imagery, there is no park over there. Can you check this?

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi Maarten Baert,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added park tag to node node/4828713832/history here. Can you check and correct it? The node should not have park tag.

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi hansolo666,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The park added here way/490688670/history seems like landuse = grass. Can you check this.

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi Stremmer,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added park tag to the node. Can you add it to the polygon where the park exists?

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi Jokosch,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The park you added here way/490701907/history#map=18/51.69028/6.87268 Doesn't seems like a park according to bing imagery. Can you verify this?

Regards,

Upendra.

Hello Myrapla,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You gave both landuse = recreation_ground and leisure = park tags to the same feature. You can keep appropriate tag and delete the other.

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi hmcsalmas1

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Instead of adding park tag to node, It's good to have park tag and name to the polygon. You can also delete the node.

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi Draconaire,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's not good to have both park and recreation_ground tags to one feature. You can keep appropriate tag and delete other.

Best,

Upendra.

Hi 한쿡인이에욥,

Welcome to OpenStreet. Does park really exists here node/4819834877/history.

Regards,

Upendra.

Hello Pampong,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You can add name of the park to the polygon which mapped around the park and delete the node. It's not good to have park tag to node. Happy mapping.

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi Jace579,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Does park really exists in this region? Looks like residential area and lot of buildings in it. Can you verify?

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi aquhcgudboy,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Instead of adding park tag to node, It would be great if you draw polygon around the park and use same tags to that. You can delete the node as it's not good to have park tag to node.Happy mapping.

Best,

Upendra.

As you mentioned that the park is split in different sections. It would be great if you map each section and give appropriate tags to them. Instead of giving land_use tags to the whole park, It's good to give respective tag to each section. Thank you for quick response.

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi turner150990,

Thanks for replying back. The landuse_1, landuse_2 tags you added do not render on OpenStreetMap.

I guess the doubt is between whether this area on the ground is a grass, recreation_ground, park or a pitch. I suggest looking at these wiki links

1.Park - leisure=park

2. Grass - landuse=grass

3. Recreation tag landuse=recreation_ground

4. Pitch -
leisure=pitch

Please add whichever you feel is appropriate from your local knowledge and remove the other tags.

Thanks,

Upendra

Thank you Freebeer for clarification .

Hi GabenForPokemonGo,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding the footway which doesn't exist in imagery. In case if you used any other source, can you mention that?

Regards,

Upendra.

Hi octants,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. According to imagery I can't see soccer pitch here way/469284392/history#map=19/40.23083/-74.67116 Landuse and leisure tags can't be given to one feature. Can you check this?

Regards,

Upendra.