Hi Adam, could I ask why you've removed the one-way tag from "Salmon Parade" in Bridgwater? Have the local council change their mind again?

Thank you mtmail, that was my mistake which I have fixed.

Hi Adam-Eye, could I ask what made you think Wickes in Taunton had closed?

Thanks Robert, I see now what you mean, a previous edit marked Wickes as disused, which was inaccurate.

Hi Robert, what made you think Wicks in Taunton had closed?

way/475589411

I believe the Church Street shop in Reading (Caversham) has closed, and a larger one has opened on Richfield Avenue.

Hi John, just an FYI, properties 50 to 58 of Mattravers Way have the post code TA1 3GN (not TA1 3FR), as do 73 onwards.

What did you remove from this location, as this was never the site of the Staplegrove Inn - the pub was by the mini roundabout further to the East.

Hi John,

I think Egremont Road only goes up to No. 63, with 65, 67, 69, 71 and 73 being part of "Crispin Close - TA4 1FQ"

*FIXME

You've added opening dates as "July 2017" to some roads that have existed for many years prior to this, why was this?

Why have you added a Costa here deptho? Has a second one been built?

Hi Bryce,

Are PhillyCarShare still trading?

From an OSM perspective the 'brand' might not be required, I couldn't say for sure. The Wiki reads "brand:wikidata=* should be accompanied by the corresponding human-readable brand=* tag." but then follows with "while this is redundant from a data perspective ..".

I'm only coming from an NSI perspective, and without the 'brand' to go along with 'brand:wikidata' many of your edits may flag with the standard "this entry looks like a brand" and I believe there might be tools out there which pick up on these, which could (rightly or wrongly) create more warning reports.

Just curious why you're only adding the 'brand:wikidata' tag and not the 'brand' tag as well?

Are these automated edits?