Where did you find the pipeline data?

Is there truly a cycleway here?

The tag deletions probably should have been in their own changeset.

Cycleway=no is usually the default and normally doesn't need to be added. I'll ask the OSM US Slack group about when to use cycleway=no.

The pedestrian crossing was not attached to any other ways making it a routing island. As such it was deleted. I'll add it back in along with the sidewalks.

The Catholic church relation was done incorrectly. They way in which it was done, made it seem as though everything but the buildings were part of the church grounds. The relation is not needed was deleted. The tags from the relation were moved onto way/1015277541.

Tagging a way with highway=cycleway implies that the route is designated for bicycles.
highway=cycleway

The last time I was here the jetty was covered with fishermen, coolers, shade tents, chairs, and other objects. Based on that I find it unlikely that anyone would want to bike up and down this path. Unless this path is purposely built or signed for bicycle usage it should remain highway=footway. If both pedestrians and cyclists have an equal share of the path, use highway=path.

See also
highway=footway
highway=path

This changeset has been reverted. There was no reason to delete the original data.

This changeset has been reverted. There was no reason to delete the original data.