I'll fix it right now. It will better than before.

Sorry for the large changeset. I was cleaning up changeset/103437046 and somehow trees in Oregon got mixed in.

Yes, many users and the DWG have talked with them. They are doing much better now and are slowly fixing their mistakes.

Fix what you can but don't worry too much about it.

Why the sudden need to delete these driveways? As far as I can tell these are valid driveways and should not have been deleted.

You and your team keep deleting and replacing perfectly fine buildings. There is no need to do this. You can edit the currently existing building.

As you are using the online editor all you need to do is, select the building, click the Feature Type ("Building" in this case), search for the "Hotel" preset. Afterward you can copy the data from the hotel node to the building.

You and your mapping team need to take better care when deleting hotel nodes. Currently you are deleting them without copying over additional data to the hotel building. We are losing good data because of this. For example in this changeset when you deleted the hotel node we lost the phone number, website, and address for this hotel. You must copy this data over the new hotel building.

Please read the wiki for guidance when mapping hotels. tourism=hotel

You and your mapping team need to take better care when deleting hotel nodes. Currently you are deleting them without copying over additional data to the hotel building. We are losing good data because of this. For example in this changeset when you deleted the hotel node we lost the phone number, website, and address for this hotel. You must copy this data over the new hotel building.

Please read the wiki for guidance when mapping hotels. tourism=hotel

You and your mapping team need to take better care when deleting hotel points. Currently you are deleting them without copying over additional data to the hotel building. We are losing good data because of this. For example in this changeset when you deleted the hotel point we lost the phone number and address for this hotel. You must copy this data over the new hotel building.

Furthermore, by tagging each building as a hotel you have created three separate hotels. You should have created an area encompassing all three building and tagged the area as a hotel with the phone number and address taken from the hotel node.

Please read the wiki for guidance when mapping hotels. tourism=hotel

You and your mapping team need to take better care when deleting hotel points. Currently you are deleting them without copying over additional data to the hotel building. We are losing good data because of this. For example in this changeset when you deleted the hotel point we lost the address for this hotel. You must copy this data over the new hotel building.

Please read the wiki for guidance when mapping hotels. tourism=hotel

Mapping a hotel as a node is an acceptable method of adding a hotel. It was not necessary to delete the hotel node. Please see tourism=hotel

Mapping a hotel as a node is an acceptable method of adding a hotel. It was not necessary to delete the hotel node. Please see tourism=hotel

Mapping a hotel as a node is an acceptable method of adding a hotel. It was not necessary to delete the hotel node. Please see tourism=hotel

Figures. I knew I should have spent more time researching. I was thinking it was just a driveway and the Tiger maps doesn't show a name for the road.

This changeset has been reverted. Please do not make fictional edits. This is a real world map on which many people rely for accurate data.

When a new user from Paris adds a "Secret Military Base" airfield in the middle of a park as their first edit without any kind of source, I am inclined to view it as a joke or vandalism. A view which was reinforced by several dragged nodes in San Francisco and Paris. To me this has all the markings of someone who is making edits for laughs.

There could very well be some type of military installation in the park in Hong Kong. However I would like a better source than the Bing imagery cited in the original changeset.

As for the size of this changeset, yes I could have made three different changesets. But as this one is a complete revert of another changeset, it's simplifies matters to have only one changeset should a mistake be made and the revert itself needs to be reverted.

This changeset has been reverted. There is no secret military base in the middle of a park. Please not make fictional edits. You also moved several nodes out of place.

Just a little note so you know what to look for next time. When you changed several neighborhoods to landuse=residential, you also deleted the place=neighborhood tag. Keep an eye out for changes like that when working with the online editor.

This is a movie cinema, not a house.

This user is recreating the same vandalism as banned users, Northridge 8, celltowerm, and vanf5060.
osm.org/user_blocks/3815
osm.org/user_blocks/4181
osm.org/user_blocks/4217

This is a dive-in theater, it has not been converted into a park.

This user is recreating the same vandalism as banned users, Northridge 8, celltowerm, and vanf5060.
osm.org/user_blocks/3815
osm.org/user_blocks/4181
osm.org/user_blocks/4217

The I-35 / TX-236 area is under going massive construction which the Mapbox imagery does not show. Please use the National Agriculture Imagery Program imagery when mapping Corpus Christi if possible.