TravGW's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 80758223 | almost 6 years ago | You don't need to add name=Turnaround to the u-turns. |
| 80697093 | almost 6 years ago | A couple of points for next time. You changed British Airways East Base to a grassy area. Landuse=industrial would be a better fit. In this changeset and a few others you added layer=1 to buildings to fix building/highway overlaps. Next time you need to move/adjust either the building or highway. If the highway goes under the building you can add covered=yes for the parts of the highway which are covered by the building. |
| 80382122 | almost 6 years ago | When adding link roads/ramps, tag them as *_link roads. osm.wiki/Highway_link |
| 80277888 | almost 6 years ago | When adding ramps you need to tag them as link roads. motorway_link, trunk_link, etc. osm.wiki/Highway_link |
| 79065557 | almost 6 years ago | You are mistaking the grass tag for the meadow tag. The grass tag is for smaller grass areas like the median between two roads. For large open fields you tag them as meadows. |
| 79033401 | almost 6 years ago | When splitting a road like this, you need to add the oneway tag to them.
|
| 78586583 | about 6 years ago | Oil field roads should be tagged as tracks.
|
| 78586230 | about 6 years ago | Oil field roads should be tagged as tracks.
|
| 78388036 | about 6 years ago | This is not how you use the viewpoint tag. It would be better to add the name to the building. |
| 78355936 | about 6 years ago | This not how you use viewpoints. tourism=viewpoint |
| 78162379 | about 6 years ago | I have read the current discussion on the mailing list and there has been no consensus or majority as to how this is to be handled. Therefore the status quo is to be maintained until the the community reaches an agreement. Once an agreement is reached, changes can be made accordingly. |
| 78162379 | about 6 years ago | The name tags has been reverted the same value it has been for the past 12 years. Until a consensus can be reached the tags should stay as they are. |
| 77887459 | about 6 years ago | Oil Field roads are often tagged as track of service roads.
|
| 77742097 | about 6 years ago | You some how changed the wikipeadia tag for the Caspian Sea to Antarctia. I fix. |
| 77395745 | about 6 years ago | This does not qualify for landuse=grass. Please see the wiki. landuse=grass |
| 77158396 | about 6 years ago | Your edit has been deleted. If you want to add your business to the map you must do so properly. Please use the correct tags. |
| 76233307 | about 6 years ago | We do not mark yawns as grassy areas. Landuse=grass is for grass only areas such as the area between a divided highway. |
| 76233026 | about 6 years ago | These are not parks. |
| 76102414 | about 6 years ago | This is something you kinda have to get a feel for. In short service roads are for navigating around a business and are not a part of the main road network. On the other hand, highway=residential is not exactly wrong either. It just depends.
If you’re deciding between residential and service within an apartment complex or mobile home park or industrial park, one factor that could help you decide is whether the roadway has a name and the buildings along the roadway carry that name in their addresses. Not a cut-and-dry thing, but one factor among many |
| 76157612 | about 6 years ago | Minor correction needed on this way way/738255255 When a road goes underneath a building you put the normal highway tag and add covered=yes or use tunnel=yes if there is a tunnel. In this case the tags should be highway=service, covered=yes. |