Feeling lucky? :-)

Mateusz, you did not get an approval from local community. This is against the rules on how we classify roads.

Ah, ok. Thank you for a clarification.

Well, I did get a blocking message, so it was intentional.

That is because Andy Townsend abused his DWG powers and blocked me from adding a comment here.

But building does exist. Only shop/name tags have to be removed.

Ilja, you haven't been here, you haven't been in any of our meetings, you haven't attended any of OSM presentations in Lithuanian conferences or lectures in Vilnius University, you haven't talked with anybody doing university practice work for OSM. So you have no knowledge and yet try to claim something. I can therefore only advice you to follow your ship ;-)

Summing up, there are automated QA rules which work according to LOCAL decisions, and all changes and tagging will abide LOCAL rules, not anybody from foreign countries. Surfaces are checked locally and/or verified against open government data.

Andy Allan, this was a collective documented decision by Lithuanian mapping community which you are NOT part of. You have never been on the spot or in the region. You've never been in touch with Lithuanian mapping community. Lithuanian mapping community has NEVER had any conflicts about this rule. It is not up to you to make decisions for local community. It is a shame that people like you are allowed to do damage in the name of as I can see useless "DWG".

You have not participated in discussion of the rules you're "interpreting". I was.

You have nothing in common with Lithuanian mapping community. You have NOT discussed it with anyone from Lithuania. Why on earth you would be imposing your personal "interpretation"?

Dviračių ir pėsčiųjų takai yra highway=path+foot=designated+bicycle=designated. Nereikia keisti į highway=cycleway. Daugiau info čia: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
Sėkmės

While I do not have any obligation to explain our decision, I anyway did that. But looks like you, Andy, fail to rise from the coders level and therefore fail to understand the reasons why we did what we did. Therefore I see further explanations here as futile. However I'm open to explaining it anyway but on a different forum - you can mail me if you want, provided you are going to actually listen and not simply waste my time.

This was a well discussed decision on how to map OSM highway classes to Lithuanian road classes. OSM is an information system which does not stand alone, it is integrated with other systems/datasets. Community/crowdsource is just one input ("input" - does not necessarily mean data). We used our brains for higher level strategic decisions, not for pin-point local technical imaginary "problems".

I'm not sure what do you expect me to see there... Automated QA rule for this is online for at least 10 years. This means no way in Lithuania can be tertiary and paved outside of major cities. And that is what I'm seeing in the history. Bridge and some parts of the road close to it is paved, road further away is not paved yet. This also reflects official Lithuanian data which we're using to synchronise/check.

Labas. Šitas privažiavimas prie sodybos nėra Šilinės gatvė.

Your map does not work (at least for me, at least at this moment), Andy. The reason for such classification is in Lithuanian road tagging rules agreed many years ago. We even have an automated QA rule for this, so this way could not have been tertiary "for ever" ;-)

Ilja, don't tell people what to do and they will not tell you where to go.

I know about peirce.gis-lab.info, I've even checked it some 10-12 years ago, but it's rules appeared pointless/incorrect in some places so they are not used in Lithuania. Lithuanian tagging rules regarding roads are here: osm.wiki/Lithuania

Jei pažymėta highway=footway - tai čia jau veikiantis tiltas - per jį bus skaičiuojamas pėsčiųjų maršrutas. Jei tiltas tik planuojamas, tai tada turi likti kaip ir buvo - highway=proposed.

Darželio pavadinimas, telefonas ir kita informacija jau buvo pažymėta ant darželio ploto (ne pastato).

Atstačiau sugadintą pėsčiųjų/dviračių tako žymėjimą. https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai