Tomas Straupis's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
98499160	almost 5 years ago	building=yes negali dengti vienas kito (atstačiau gerą buvusį benzino kolonėlės žymėjimą)
98526791	almost 5 years ago	Šitam pakeitime skylėtasis iD kažką sugadino su pastatais. Atsirado vieno kelio ryšys pastatams su nekorektišai sukombinuotu ir dubliuotu namo numeriu 11;9.
98525575	almost 5 years ago	Kaune nėra adreso Žemaičių 125A.
98369978	almost 5 years ago	Bažnyčios yra „aptarnaujanti“/„paslaugų“ dalis gyvenamosios zonos, tai landuse=residential. Grynai šventorius gali būti landuse=religious, bet nežinau, ar kas nors naudoja tokius duomenis ir kam jų galėtų reikėti.
98173690	almost 5 years ago	Supratau, tai tada nuimsiu ir trackgrade žymas. Ačiū už info!
98163753	almost 5 years ago	Atstačiau Puškino gimnazijai landuse=residential. Mokykla irgi yra gyvenamoji žemėnauda.
98173690	almost 5 years ago	Tai šitais pakeistais keliais mašina neįmanoma važiuoti? T.y. tai siauri takeliai, kur mašina (tarkim miškininkų ar policininkų) netilptų? Tepa tik pėstieji ir iš bėdos dviratininkai?
98110515	almost 5 years ago	Yes, ORT10LT precision is <1m. Much better than GPS tracks.
98120297	almost 5 years ago	Iki šiol mes OpenStreetMap vadovavomės tokia logika: jei galima statyti palapines (likti nakvoti), tai - stovyklavietė. Poilsiavietė - kur galima tik pabūti be nakvynės.
98110515	almost 5 years ago	Hello. Maxar imagery is not correctly rectified. Please either adjust it according to ORT10LT or simply use ORT10LT - that one is government imagery and is precisely positioned.
97952892	almost 5 years ago	Chrm. Atstačiau daug sugadintų žymų: Akademijos, Akemų labirinto ir pan. Nereikia pačiais pirmais keitimas iš karto „taisyti“ to, kas jau yra sužymėta, pradžioje reikia gerai išsiaiškinti kodėl ilgiau žymintys būtent taip šituos objektus sužymėjo. Sėkmės!
96541642	almost 5 years ago	Hello Yes, I could have commented on your changeset to contact you, will do it next time. Meanwhile: 1. I was actually correcting a broken river - this is what attracted me to the spot. 2. My source is Lithuanian government data visible here: https://www.geoportal.lt/map/ 3. Same border data is depicted on official ortophoto map ORT10LT (narrow white line) 4. In this part of the world borders usually follow the river when water travels (as opposed to border having fixed geometry and thus deviating from the riverpath in time). That is in official/source border documents it should be said that "border between A and B follows the river R" as opposed as having an array of specific coordinates. That said I have NOT checked the actual border source document. I've only checked official maps.
97598756	almost 5 years ago	A lot of questions, so I will split them into several points :-) 1st point: iD is considered a very bad editor in Lithuania and its suggestions of "deprecated tags" are considered harmful by default. We will be introducing our own version of iD with correct tagging presets. 2nd point: there was incorrect relation for buildings created. iD is very bad at handling relations. 3rd point. If there are actually any deprecated/outdated tags we decide that in Lithuanian maillist and then update ALL occurrences at once in automated or semi-automated fashion. 4th point. Building footprints. There was no building import done in Lithuania. Initially we used Microsofts (Bing) ortophoto which is famous for extremely bad quality geocoordination (with photo being offset up to 20 meters). If buildings were initially vectorised before 2013 - they could be from Bing era. Later we introduced government ortophoto ORT10LT which is very precise, but it does not mean all buildings have been reviewed and corrected.
97850527	almost 5 years ago	Nereikia klausyti iD redaktoriaus neteisingų „patarimų“ keisti žymas :-) atstačiau landuse=basin. Daugiau žymint būtų pats laukas pagalvoti apie pilnavertį redaktorių - JOSM https://blog.openmap.lt/2014/05/31/ivadas-i-josm/
97837557	almost 5 years ago	I agree - bad visual hierarchy. Comes from old times when railway stations were important. Will look at fixing it in our maps (*.openmap.lt) - https://github.com/openmaplt/vector-map/issues/360 Thank you for noticing!
97837557	almost 5 years ago	Reverted. Classification was fine. Smaller one is a railway station (according to LT classification), therefore -> town+rank=20, smaller one is a village.
97747123	almost 5 years ago	Fixed some service->footway. Maxar Premium imagery has offset in alignment, fixed according to precise ORT10LT.
97617781	almost 5 years ago	Aš kadangi vietoj netikrinau Kauno medžių, tai nežinau, kaip ten realiai. Jei tikrai apytiksliai medžiai sutaškuoti (Kaune iš tiesų daug kas yra gan atmestiniai prižymėta), tai tada suprantamas keitimas į linijas. Ačiū už paaiškinimą.
97617781	almost 5 years ago	O kam reikia keisti atskirai/konkrečiai pažymėtus medžius į medžių juostas? Juk taip padaromas prastesnis/mažiau tikslus žymėjimas.
97598756	almost 5 years ago	What is being done here and why? Because I see a number of incorrect changes including this one.