Good day. Assessing the classification of roads can be difficult from aerial imagery alone. Before up- or downgrading please check way histories to see if existing classifications might have been sourced from actual on the ground surveys. Thank you!

Good day. Assessing the classification of roads can be difficult from aerial imagery alone. The road that was upgraded to tertiary in this changeset ist a dirt road that is barely passable by cars. Please check way histories to see if existing classifications might be sourced from on the ground mapping. Thank you!

Good day. Assessing the classification of roads can be difficult from aerial imagery alone. Please check way histories to see if existing classifications might be sourced from on the ground mapping. Also please consider using the tag surface=unpaved when changing tracks to unclassified or residential. Thank you!

Good day. Assessing the classification of roads can be difficult from aerial imagery alone. The two segments in this changeset are very rough roads that are almost exclusively used by residents. Please check way histories to see if existing classifications might be sourced from on the ground mapping. Thanks!

This changeset ist full of fictional objects (tertiary type balo rd, spice bridge, landuse farmland, etc.) as well as tagging errors (waterway segments tagged as highways, road name abbreviations, etc.). Are you aware that edits like this are harming the effort of countless volunteers who are working together to create an accurate map of the world?

You upgraded way/761154760 from construction to trunk. This does not seem to be right to me. This road is still heavily under construction and not yet open for public. Even once construction is finished it will rather be a primary road than a trunk.

This specific segment of the davao coastal road is not even under construction yet. May I ask what led you to upgrade it to tertiary?

In this changeset you changed a properly mapped culvert segment of a river from a waterway into a roadtype and you removed the culvert related tags. I'm noticing that many of your changesets contain "mistakes" of that manner... are you aware of this?

You changed the roadtype from track to tertiary for way/540276816 and 114758306. May I ask you what led you to do so? I've passed by that road just yesterday and it's clearly still an unpaved track that's barely passable for motor vehicles.

Thanks for letting me know. I forgot to check the position inside the relation after merging two oneway segments. The problem should be fixed now.

That's indeed how bridges should be mapped. Did I accidentally create one differently in this changeset?

Hi manings, thank you! The removal of the tags was unintentional, I reversed it now. I was just trying to figure out how to edit several roads at once.