Hello Gitzy, welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions. The correct admin_level for barangays would be 10. And by the way, the road that you tagged as primary looks more like a tertiary. I will send you a private message with some links that might be helpful for learning about tagging conventions. Happy mapping! =)

Hello mani_sh5. Could you please have another look at way/904137454? There does not seem to be any bridge there. In situations like this you can connect the road and waterway with a node and tag it as ford=yes.

Hello. The freedom to map the world in OpenStreetMap has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world. Please remove the personal data about residents and lot ownership that you added. (for more details see: osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information)

The tag man_made=survey point is meant for "a triangulation pillar, geodetic vertex, or other piece of fixed equipment used by topographers". OSM is a database for things that are observeable on the ground. Please don't misuse tags for random notes like this one.

Hello. Many people in the local OSM community are wondering what you're doing. You're changeset comments are not very useful at helping us understand. Please have a look at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

This is really a tricky case. I've now disconnected all roads from the aeroways and solved the issue with a separate unclassified way running parallel to the runway to preserve routability. Thanks again for the heads-up!

It will take some time until it becomes routable on Strava. They only update their map every 2-3 months.

Good day choessei. Thanks for your contributions to OSMaPaaralan. The reason why this data is manually reviewed through MapRoulette and not just automatically imported is because many of the coordinates are not accurate. Please always check surrounding place or street names for verification. Here you replaced the tags of an existing school. I've reverted this and moved Little Baguio Elementary School to the correct location a few kilometers further south. Keep up the good work!

Hello Dhadz. You're adding a lot of shops and amenities. Did you visit all of them yourself or are you using information from another map or database?

Hello again. Since you're back at adding lots of shops and restaurants it would be nice if you could comment on this! Have a nice evening.

Hello ortegajovan41. You're adding a lot of shops and amenities. Did you visit all of them yourself or are you using information from another map or database?

Thanks for pointing this out. I've removed the problematic way. I also noticed that ending the service road at the outline of the apron resulted in a validation error. I connected it directly to the taxiway instead (as the whole surface area of the aeroway can be accessed through this road). Could you have another look to doublecheck if this conforms with conventions?

Hello Zaculeu. Not every airport has gates and fences. This one does not only serve as a roadway for traffic heading to Punta Maria, it's also completely open for anyone from playing kids to bikers to people practicing how to drive ;)

I've removed the non-existent access restrictions for you. Have a nice day!

Hello Cabinet23. Thank you for your contributions to OSM. When you find things to be in the wrong location please just move them instead of deleting and creating a new object. I've restored the old nodes for Barangays 87 and 90 (see changeset/103285918) as they had many other tags in addition to just name and place. This also preserves the past edit history. By the way, the correct place tag for barangays is village or quarter. Town is meant for municipalities. For more details you could check the OSM wiki. Keep up the good work!

Hello Seasalt. What is the source for the name of this village?

Hello lawrence_ruiz. Thank you for your contributions. This mountain is quite far away from any actual peak. You could use OpenTopoMap to see the elevation profile of the area. I already moved it to the nearest possible location, do you wanna check if I got it right? Keep up the good work!

It is clearly visible on aerial imagery that there are no fords at node/8620445559 and 8620445558 and that the lower parts of the stream that you added takes a very different course than what you mapped. Also I have on the ground knowledge that there is no bridge at way/929514995. Please don't add non-existent things to OSM.

Hello. Please have a look at the local as well as the general mapping conventions for road classifications. None of the roads that you upgraded to primary and trunk seem to meet the definitions.

Also please have a look at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Sarangani is hundreds of kilometers away from the edits in this changeset and "Waypoint" does not describe well the huge amount of changes to well established road classifications that you made.

Good day gillhsu. The road link that you added (way/929553066) does not exist. Please only connect roads when they're clearly visible on aerial imagery. As for way/929553067, this would be better tagged as service than unclassified. There are detailled descriptions of all highway tags on the OSM wiki. Happy mapping!

Good day yuehtsai, please always make sure to download all the existing data in an area before adding new roads. This way you will avoid adding duplicates of roads that already exist in the database. Also please have a look at the definitions of motorway and residential roads. I've reverted this changeset.