OK, so like OSM Relatify?

You may want to read: osm.wiki/Proposal:Simpler_public_transport_route_relations and the various push backs on the tagging list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-March/051442.html. Which I would mischievously sum up as “it’s too hard for the data consumer and may not be 100% correct, therefore the mapper should be forced to do all the work”.

Another tip is that Osmose has a broken boundary check, so you can set up a RSS feed to find out when they break. It’s a lot easier if there hasn’t been too much editing in the mean time.

I have tried to fix some of the Irish ones in the past, but they require a lot of obscure local knowledge that I don’t have.

OK, we have a winner in Berlin (where else could it have been?). Mostly due the hot mess that is the payment:* family.

Apparently this pub is payment:cash = yes, payment:coins = yes and payment:notes= no. Shouldn’t that be payment:cash = it depends ?

Don’t forget Richard’s plea for sanity from 2013.

Welcome.

Drop by at the Oceania community on the OSM Community forum or in the #oceania thread on the OpenStreetMap World Discord if you need any help…or just want to say hi.

Don’t forget to read Richard’s classic on the subject of paths. Nothing has improved since 2013.

If you are going to do multilingual diary posts, would you please split them into separate posts under the appropriate language categories. For example, a French speaker is not going to see this post because it does not appear under osm.org/diary/fr.

Thanks.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway=pedestrian is already in use as the outline of a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian, which is not what you have here.

Does having something you mapped get deleted count as “reverted”? Or is it just things that have their state returned to their former state?

Meanwhile in Sydney….

TIL hectad…doubt I’ll be using it too often.