Good question. This went in 9 years ago changeset/17083631 as proposed. Nine months ago you changed it to construction changeset/116452012. I was doing some mapping around here and noticed there was a highway that was supposed to be under construction but I couldn't find it on the imagery, so I changed it back to proposed, on the assumption that the original mapper had known what they were doing.

If you think the work they've done in town replaces the bypass proposal, then I would suggest you just delete it.

@aharvey ... just discovered this through a QA warning. I agree that hazmat with a conditional would be better.

Hi,

You've made way/1105955065 oneway which means you can't do a right turn into the Crescent. There are turn arrows visible in the aerial imagery.

Was this edit based in a survey?

Thanks.

Hi,

You've added a no right turn restriction at the intersection at way/568373745 which means you can't turn from Port Hacking Road in to Kareena Road. There are turn arrows in the Bing imagery that suggests otherwise. Was this edit based on a survey?

Thanks.

Hi,

You have modified the intersection at way/1085084674 so that right turns from Showground Road are no longer possible.

There is a turn lane and turn lines in the Bing imagery that suggests otherwise. Was your edit based on a survey?

Thanks.

Hi,

Your roundabout mapping is not quite correct. Have a read of junction=roundabout to find out how to map them.

Happy Mapping.

For context there are about 5130 no left turn restrictions in AU. Only 27 of them need to use a way as the via. So it's more likely that a new left turn restriction with a via way is a mistake than really needing to use a way as the via.

It means what it says. These turn restrictions need to use a way as the via rather than a node. The note is to let mappers know this and to allow me to filter out the ones that I have not checked yet.

Hi,

Closed polygon highways like way/512427877 need to have an area=yes tag.

Thanks.

I wish people would use the correct tagging. If a street is closed with a barrier then map the barrier.

That should have been convert to no u-turn

Hmm based on the fixme I added looks like I couldn't tell if this was operational yet or still planned. If it doesn't have an IUCN Cat, then you can use protect_class=7. I would add both tags just to be sure.

Lolz.... you beat me by two hours.

Hi,

Are you sure people can't turn right out of Caledonian Avenue?

Thanks.

I've checked and removed all the duplicates I could find.

Hi,

You might want to check for existing railway=yard before adding more. You've added a number of duplicates around the coal mines of QLD.

Thanks.

Good question. I don't know. I assume that historic: might mean abandoned: and station_site probably means station? Unless it means somewhere they were going to build a station but never did.

I have gone through the Vicmap data to check to make sure all of the former stations were tagged with a lifecycle prefix. I was unaware that station_site was a thing so I may have missed a bunch of these.

I've started looking for duplicates of this type and it turns out I'm not the only person who didn't know about this.

Hi,

What is way/1054352669 supposed to be?

Thanks.

Hi,

The no-left turn restriction is required because there is a left turn slip lane. The no-right turn restriction is required because u-turns are not permitted at traffic lights.

I have put them back to what they were.

Happy Mapping.

Hi,

This changeset allowed people coming up the off ramp at node/280889414 to cross over and go down the ramp. Another mapper tried to fix it but their turn restriction wasn't valid. I put cross back in to force the right turn but still let the left turn down the ramp go.

Can you please review.

Thanks.