There is a note right at the start of that document that says:

" All development areas included on plans are subject to change and represent indicative design for roads/
open space etc at the time of the Landscape Masterplan report being written. This will be subject to ongoing
design development."

Unless you have some other source I think we should leave the boundaries as they are in the NPWS Estate data set.

Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

What source are you using for the boundaries of Wianamatta Regional Park? Your changes do not match the data in the NPWS Estate or the LPI data sets.

Don't know. Merged and moved the peak to the high point on SRTM.

Thanks for your contribution.

When choosing a value for surface it helps if you pick one from the existing list (surface=*) rather than inventing your own.

Happy mapping.

Hi,

Thanks for your contribution. This needs some sort of tag to indicate what it is. The most appropriate for this may be highway=path (highway=path).

Happy mapping.

Once you've done the pits you can outline the area that has the associated processing with landuse=industrial (landuse=industrial)

Thanks for all of your contributions. It's good to have someone local adding to the map.

Looking at the satellite imagery the "Invincible Waste Dump" appears to be a spoil heap. It might be better to tag it man_made=spoil_heap (man_made=spoil_heap)

Happy mapping.

Hi,

You've deleted the school tag off this: relation/5919984

Did you mean to do this? Is this no longer a school? If so you should delete the whole lot.

Thanks.

Hi,

When you are mapping houses you need to outline the structure not the block that it is sitting on.

Thanks.

Changeset reverted at #59229778. maxspeed tags on nodes.

Reverted at changeset #59228612. maxspeed tags on nodes.

Actually reverting changeset #59228079.

Reverted at changeset #59228405. maxspeed tags added to nodes.

Hi,

You appear to have added maxspeed tags to several hundred nodes. I think you need learn how to use JOSM before you try any more bulk edits.

Thanks.

Well that was a brain fade by me. Guess it came across from my previous changeset: changeset/44150099

I've deleted this one. According to their website this is not where their office is.

I've deleted this one. There's no evidence on their website that this is a real address.

Looks OK. Just two things for next time:

1. Needs an object tag of some form to describe what this is (so office = private).

2. Australia has states rather than provinces (so addr:state = QLD).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58940927

Hi, please be more careful with your edits. This church node/21465648 is not in Nairobi.

Recycled changeset comment. Take a look at the tagging in this changeset and none of them say historic. I was caught out by the same thing on one of their other changesets where they haven't changed the comment from the last thing they uploaded. As you've discovered the changeset comments don't get any better from here.