This changeset has been reverted. The first step for an import is to discuss it on talk-au:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

This changeset has been reverted.

The first step for an import is to discuss it on talk-au:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55150655

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55151214

No, this was a screw-up.

I have put the coastlines back in at #54161930.

There were three natural=beach that were removed and I've put them back in at #54164396, however these are now tagged both natural=sand (at relation level) and natural=beach (at way level) and at least one of them doesn't look like a beach:
way/183254975

And one mud flat in #54164440 which was tagged water at the relation level but I changed back to mud as that was the original tagging:

http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3007187

Grass not heath

Grass not heath

Did you mean:

landcover=grass

for:

way/543211807 ?

Hi,

There is no heath in Australia. I think you'll need to use a better tag for:

way/543211886

Street sign, G-NAF and LPI says Douglas Street. I think you can safely arm-chair this one.

Hi.

Alternative names get tagged alt_name=Turning Japanese (see: name=*).

Yeap, I've seen the same style sign on the Hume. They line up with the NSW tourism regions:

https://www.destinationnsw.com.au/tourism/facts-and-figures/sydney-tourism-statistics

I guess if that's what admin_level 7 should be then we need to change the definition.

I was thinking that if you really don't like this definition of level 7 then we could change this to boundary=statistical stats_level=SUA. I find this type of boundary useful as I don't have the wherewithal to run my own spatial database but I can use these in Overpass.

Hi

tracktype=grade7 ? Did you mean grade5? or is this some system other than tracktype?

That should of said: Fixed note #1176717

osm.wiki/Attribution/data.brisbane.qld.gov.au_explicit_permission

Inner way only touches outer way a one point. This is a valid multipolygon, no need to edit.

Would be better to use the note key. The description key is really just for SEO spam (or at least that's what 99+% of the use appears to be).

1. W1-1(L) and W1-1(R). Sometimes written as W1-1L but more common to have parentheses.

2. alpha-2 codes are upper-case so AU not au.

3. Rather than "road_sign:backward" would be better as a note.

There's always a backup:

osm.wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Attic_data_.28.22date.22.29

That's how I checked to make sure everything had gone back to how it was just before this changeset.

OK. I have reverted this changeset and all of the downstream dependent changesets.

I have done a check, using Overpass, of the data inside State Circle and it is now identical to what is was just before this changeset.

Anything that's broken now is due to changeset #51485067.

Once again apologies for breaking your data. I still don't know why the reverter didn't fully revert the changeset.