Hi,

If you are doing comments in opening_hours would you please use U+0022 as the delimiter. Other versions, such as U+201D and U+201C, are not valid under the spec opening_hours=*/specification.

This may be an issue with Go Map!!, but I haven't used it and I don't know what the workflow is for adding opening hours. If the app chooses the style of quote to use, then we might need to post a bug.

Thanks.

Doesn't matter, you are still not allowed to use it.

Hi,

Welcome to OSM. Just to let you know, we do not have permission to use SLIP data in OSM. There is a list of the data sources you are allowed to use on the wiki osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Western_Australia

Thanks.

Hi,

You have put relation/15310289 into two route masters relation/349554 and relation/349555. By definition it can only be one. Would you please delete the one it is not supposed to be in please, as I don't know enough about Vic trains to know.

Thanks.

Hi,

If you are going to split intersections such as at way/1267367744 can you please check to make sure that:

1. The oneway is in the correct direction.
2. That any existing turn restrictions are fixed. There is a no right turn sign into Allum Street.

I have fixed this one.

Thanks.

Hi,

I think the oneway on way/1267303556/ was back to front.

I have flipped it around, if you really can't turn into Boyd Street then please delete my fix.

Thanks.

Hi,

This changeset removed the right-hand turn out of Old Princes Hwy. I am assuming that you didn't mean to do that, and added it back in way/1266060720.

If the right-hand turn has gone then please remove my edit.

Thanks.

Which one?

Hi,

If you are going to remove a turn restriction then please delete the relation, don't just break the existing one.

Thank you.

Hi @VLD190

The problem is that JOSM throws false warnings if a multipolygon has touching rings and the ways are split at the common node. If one of the ways continues through the common node then JOSM only gives an info message of ring share node.

Sorry, didn't see your first message.

These were mapped from the map notes, if you have surveyed them then that better than what I was going off.

Hi,

I am assuming that this is some organised mapping being carried out by Meta.

What is the feedback mechanism to explain that these relations do not need to be "fixed".

This is the third time I have had to revert a Meta "fix" to these relations and I am starting to become annoyed.

Thank you.

Reverted changeset because it broke the boundaries of Lower North East Special Management Zone Number 1 Protected Area and Upper and Lower North East Old Growth Protected Area

changeset/147847658

Hi,

You have put the wrong wikidata identifier on the bounded locality of Sydney. The CBD is not officially defined and is not necessariliy the same thing as the bounded locality.

Thanks.

Hi,

Are you sure you can't turn right into and out of way/95266539 from North Rocks Road?

Thanks.

Hi,

Are you sure that you can't turn right into way/23164600 from President Avenue?

Thanks.

If we're being technical here then it also only applies up to the first road crossing see Rule 242(2) http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_reg/rr2014104/s242.html

40N is the street number not the lot number. The legal boundaries are based on allotments not the street address.

I just noticed that the Esri imagery has the new SES building on it at low zoom.

Hi Folks,

Well this is an interesting one. I eventually found the gazettal and based on VicMap Property most of allotment 2086 (https://production-detailed-report-pdf.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/Allot-2086-Parish-Of-Frankston-(ID216301107)-Detailed-Property-Report.pdf) is missing in the ParkRes dataset. I've adjusted the boundaries to match.

boulton_zak could you check the location of the new SES building. Based on the Property data and what I can see on Sentinel I think it's a bit to the west of where it is now.

Thanks, and happy mapping.