OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
174719869 about 1 month ago

Hallo Adrie Stoopen,

Waarom heb je hier deze stukken gras verwijdert? Ik kan deze nog op de satelliet beelden terugzien.
way/594938529
way/594940131
way/594940137

Ook heb je hier een pad/trap verwijdert die ik nog terug kan vinden. way/542090892

Is dit allemaal recent verwijdert?

174719171 about 1 month ago

Hallo Adrie Stoopen,

Dus de bomen aan de zijkant en dat pad daar bovenaan zijn ook weg?

En ik zie dat je de vorm van het gebouw hebt aangepast. Waarom?

Groeten,
Taya Snijder

174643969 about 1 month ago

Hello emilmaks,

I have reverted your deletions. On OSM it is perfectly acceptable to map features others might deem as not critical or necessary. As long as the object actually exists, it can be mapped.

Deleting objects that you do not wish to see on the map, whether you believe it to be a burden, clutter, unnecessary, or optional, is not a valid reason.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder,
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group

changeset/174644647

174513203 about 1 month ago

Hello,

I had a question. Whose 'user reports' are these? Where does this data come from? How was it verified?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

174148206 about 1 month ago

changeset/174368378

174148206 about 1 month ago

Hello Michael,

Thanks for pointing those out to me. No, I did not intent to leave those there. It seems that some of the objects that were edited twice weren't reverted correctly. I'll make sure to clean those up either this evening or sometime tomorrow.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

174269176 about 1 month ago

May I also remind you of this paragraph of the Automated Edits Code of Conduct:

The purpose of this policy is to avoid the database being damaged. Be very aware that it can be hard or impossible to revert or 'roll back' inappropriate edits, particularly where further edits have been made to features touched by the changes and careless automated edits can therefore create considerable work for other parties to repair the damage. Ignoring this policy will be treated as vandalism and will be responded to as such if it persists.

174268519 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174268514 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174268509 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174268481 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174268503 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174269180 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174269176 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174269170 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174269164 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174269157 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174269141 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042

174269137 about 1 month ago

Thanks ika-chan!, I've also gone ahead and reverted all additional changesets in changeset/174330042

174269077 about 1 month ago

Reverted in changeset/174330042