All changes have been reverted in changeset/164624244

Hello mranderson2025,

Would you mind explaining what was wrong with the alt_names added by Kovoschiz?

changeset/164613506
Kovoschiz left you a comment here. It is generally better to discus tagging disagreements.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group

Reverted by changeset/164598674

Already reverted, but I can't comment on an open changeset

Hello tcgcwaypoint,

Why are you using non standard tags here?

Why are you using 'pathway=yes' as opposed to highway=*? What is a "building=Senior High School Building"? What is "parking=Parking Area"

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

Hello Bit Johnson,

There already is a node present for address 109.

In such cases it is preferred to just add the info to the existing node. This prevents duplicate information.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

reverted vandalism

changeset/164583591

reverted vandalism

changeset/164583501

Then they could be waiting a very long time. From what I know the last time Pokemon Go updated their map data was several years ago.

Please see: osm.org/user_blocks/17515

reverted vandalism

changeset/164583093

Hello,

Was this meant to be a service road?

Hello Fetter Streets,

OpenStreetMap is a database. How they choose to display our data is up to them. Deleting these ways because it looks bad on some maps is considered vandalism.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group.

Reverted vandalism

changeset/164554994

Reverted vandalism

changeset/164554994

Hello yaroslavrepin2013,

Could you explain why this residential landuse was unnecessary? Deleting valid data is generally not a good idea.

Taya Snijder, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Removed in changeset/164509923

Removed in changeset/164509890

Removed in changeset/164509835

Reverted vandalism. DWG Ticket#2025040310000403

changeset/164460254