OpenStreetMap
Taya_S's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 162644563 | 10 months ago | Reverted SEO vandalism |
| 162565891 | 10 months ago | Hello, I have reverted this edit. Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 Sincerely,
|
| 161605690 | 10 months ago | Hello starspangledmodz, Mapping in OpenStreetMap because you wish to play a game that uses our map is totally fine, but you are expected to follow the same mapping standards as everyone else. There are some issues with the names you have given these landuses. Names are reserved for what objects are actually called. You can read more about it here: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only I have removed the names from the objects you have added You can read more about how to get started and good practices on our wiki:
Happy mapping,
|
| 162521514 | 10 months ago | Hi Spaghetti Monster, Thanks for removing those fantasy names. Just be aware that its not just farmland they are adding names to. I removed the remaining names in changeset/162549684 |
| 162301661 | 10 months ago | Hello Bigdogtrucker1, Mapping in OpenStreetMap because you wish to play a game that uses our map is totally fine, but you are expected to follow the same mapping standards as everyone else. There are some issues with the names you have given these landuses. Names are reserved for what objects are actually called. You can read more about it here: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only You can read more about how to get started and good practices on our wiki:
Happy mapping,
|
| 162293257 | 10 months ago | Hello Wishinggamer3-2025, Mapping in OpenStreetMap because you wish to play a game that uses our map is totally fine, but you are expected to follow the same mapping standards as everyone else. There are some issues with the names you have given these farmlands. Names are reserved for what objects are actually called. You can read more about it here: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only You can read more about how to get started and good practices on our wiki:
Happy mapping,
|
| 162524823 | 10 months ago | Hello jett1997, Mapping in OpenStreetMap because you wish to play a game that uses our map is totally fine, but you are expected to follow the same mapping standards as everyone else. There are some issues with the names you have given these farmlands. Names are reserved for what objects are actually called. You can read more about it here: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Additionally you also added farmlands on top of already mapped farmland. The farmland you added was more detailed, so I deleted the older rougher farmland. You can read more about how to get started and good practices on our wiki:
Happy mapping,
|
| 162514465 | 11 months ago | Hello Dan McNarry, You are creating duplicated data. These roads you are creating are on top of other already existing road. Same issue for this road way/1359904421 This is not correct and can also create issues with routing. I would also like to ask you to please read the comments in changeset/162487980 again. The same concept as with the name of farmlands also applies to roads and everything else. Unless a road is actually named "farm road" it should not be named as such. Sincerely,
|
| 162426741 | 11 months ago | Hallo wandelaar123, Omdat er nog vraagstukken zijn over het verwijderen van deze hoogzitten, heb ik je wijzigingen weer teruggedraaid. Wij willen niet dat zomaar geldige data wordt verwijderd, maar ook niet dat niet meer geldige data in onze database blijft staan. We horen daarom graag nog van je op het forum, zodat de situatie zo nauwkeurig mogelijk op de kaart gezet kan worden. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nieuwe-mapper-verwijdert-data-uit-osm/99681/52 Met vriendelijke groet,
|
| 162425331 | 11 months ago | Hallo wandelaar123, Omdat er nog vraagstukken zijn over het verwijderen van deze hoogzitten, heb ik je wijzigingen weer teruggedraaid. Wij willen niet dat zomaar geldige data wordt verwijderd, maar ook niet dat niet meer geldige data in onze database blijft staan. We horen daarom graag nog van je op het forum, zodat de situatie zo nauwkeurig mogelijk op de kaart gezet kan worden. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nieuwe-mapper-verwijdert-data-uit-osm/99681/52 Met vriendelijke groet,
|
| 162425247 | 11 months ago | Hallo wandelaar123, Omdat er nog vraagstukken zijn over het verwijderen van deze hoogzitten, heb ik je wijzigingen weer teruggedraaid. Wij willen niet dat zomaar geldige data wordt verwijderd, maar ook niet dat niet meer geldige data in onze database blijft staan. We horen daarom graag nog van je op het forum, zodat de situatie zo nauwkeurig mogelijk op de kaart gezet kan worden. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nieuwe-mapper-verwijdert-data-uit-osm/99681/52 Met vriendelijke groet,
|
| 162487980 | 11 months ago | Hello Dan McNarry, It seems that you are coming to OpenStreetMap to map for some sort of game, is this correct? And if so, would you mind telling me the name of the game? Mapping in OpenStreetMap because you wish to play a game that uses our map is totally fine, but you are expected to follow the same mapping standards as everyone else. There are some issues with the names you have given these farmlands, as it is unlikely for all these farmlands to have simple numbers as names. It is also very uncommon for mappers to delete the things they just added to the map. You can read more about how to get started and good practices on our wiki:
Happy mapping,
|
| 162489149 | 11 months ago | Hello MSAeditest, You just deleted this construction area completely. This implies there is now nothing there anymore. Normally after construction has been completed the `landuse=contruction` either gets retagged to represent its new function, or it gets replaced with a more detailed mapping of the now completed area. Sincerely,
|
| 162477820 | 11 months ago | Hello Scout87, It seems that you are coming to OSM to map for some sort of game, is this correct? And if so, would you mind telling me the name of the game? Mapping in OpenStreetMap because you wish to play a game that uses our map is totally fine, but you are expected to follow the same mapping standards as everyone else. There are some issues with the names you have given these farmlands, as it is unlikely for all these farmlands to have these numbered names in reality. Would you mind removing these? You can read more about how to get started and good practises on our wiki:
Happy mapping,
|
| 162456555 | 11 months ago | Reverted SEO vandalism |
| 162455407 | 11 months ago | Reverted SEO vandalism |
| 162454937 | 11 months ago | Reverted SEO vandalism |
| 162454481 | 11 months ago | Reverted SEO vandalism |
| 162292805 | 11 months ago | I have removed the names in changeset/162437541 |
| 162425331 | 11 months ago | Hallo Wandelaar123, Bij OpenStreetMap verwijderen we over het algemeen geen privé-objecten als deze nog bestaan. In plaats daarvan voegen we access=private toe. Meer hierover lees je op deze wiki pagina: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property Hoewel deze richtlijn over paden gaat, is het hier ook van toepassing. Op de meest recente PDOK-beelden en satellietportaal beelden zie ik nog steeds een aantal jachttorens staan. Zie bijvoorbeeld: osm.org/edit?editor=id#map=21/52.1905798/6.1374518 Zou je kunnen toelichten hoe dit zit?
Met vriendelijke groet,
|