reverted incorrectly added access tags

changeset/149962095

reverted incorrectly added access tags

changeset/149962095

Access tags are only to be used for legal access. Unless there is a sign prohibiting cyclists from cycling ehre it should not be tagged as bicycle=no

Please use access=private if the access is private. Access=no means no one can use this path

Why did you add bicycle=no here? I'm pretty sure you are allowed to cycle here

Ziet er goed uit!

Hallo S3mT3x2024,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Ik heb ook de namen die je deze stukjes gras hebt gegeven weer verwijderd. bij OSM geven we alleen namen aan dingen als ze ook daadwerkelijk zo heten, aub dus geen beschrijfende namen.

Groeten,
Taya

I have some concerns about the source of this edit. You added details to the wreck such as railings, gates, the mast and more.

What source did you use to map the titanic like that?

Hi, I just stumbled upon way/1043474699

Is this correctly mapped? It only has a source tag and is not part of any relation

Sincerely,
Taya

I have done a timely revert of this changeset in changeset/149944704

Sincerely,
Taya

Changeset comment should have been: Removed incorrect speed limits.

Then something must have gone wrong. In this changeset and in changeset/149890682 you deleted all the roads.

I reverted the deletions and removed the speed limits and names. Could you check whether everything is correct now? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149898400

Sincerely,
Taya

Hi, why did you delete these roads here? They are plainly visible on satellite imagery

I deleted this building in 149494534 before discovering this comment.

This user also seems to be misusing OSM as their own database. Creating an undocumented tag and having 100% of all values link to their own website is not approriate imo.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/payment%3Alightning%3Acompanion_app_url#overview

I found some random objects in the middle of the ocean. I deleted them in:
changeset/149493025
changeset/149492937

I'm impressed that these misplaced nodes managed to survive for 17 years. A few more months and these nodes would have been old enough to drink.

I deleted them in changeset/149492629

@iandees I have reported them. They're a pretty obvious alt of these 2 accounts: @CoolGuy2004
@CoolJoe2022

@Jon Snow 47 If you want the DWG to intervene then you can mail them at [email protected] where you explain the situation.

osm.wiki/Data_Working_Group

Opzich heb je daar wel een punt. persoonlijk voeg ik afgesloten paden in kwetsbare natuurgebieden al niet toe. In het kader van dieren rust.

Ik neem aan dat hier in de toekomst heide planten gaan groeien. Dus mischien kun je in de toekomst de kades intekenen als heide ipv embankment?