Correction: Bing aerial imagery was used

This does not seem like a motorway junction. They can be used on roads that are not motorways, but these are usually clearly marked as exits on signs and can have exit numbers that should be added as ref tags(highway=motorway_junction). If you want to add a signpost referring to where the road leads you can add it as a destination on way (destination=*) or a destination in a relation (osm.wiki/Relation:destination_sign). Please review this.

Hi,
Per Wiki guidelines for Australia alt A2 should be tagged as network=alt and ref=A2 ( osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Route_Numbers). If you need additional resources on tagging or clarification, feel free to reach out.

Hi!
Barriers are visible on Esri and Bing, and also there is an image, https://openstreetcam.org/details/1388066/68/track-info that has a larger gate for regular vehicles, but also a smaller white barrier, a little more to the left, with two blue signs. Based on this (http://www.trailadventures.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/9-Lake-Tekapo-to-Twizel.pdf) and that OSC imagery it seems that bicycles and pedestrians can access it. Hope this helps.
Thanks!

Wrong upload comment was submitted. Fixing roof_level of several buildings in Pariske komune, Belgrade, Serbia.

Thanks for letting me know.
I think this can happen due to value or keys of tags being automatically memorized and suggested in JOSM so once you make one typo it is easy to make more of them. I will be more careful in the future.

Thanks,
Tara

No problem, I assumed so. If you have any questions concerning destination sign relation or anything else feel free to contact me. I'll be happy to help.
Best,
Tara

Hi,

By making this roundabout a full circle you’ve affected destination relation that it has. In the future please be careful of the relations that you are potentially braking when combining/splitting ways (destination_sign, turn_restriction..).
I also don't think all roundabouts should be made a single way. Some roundabouts tend to have different lane information and by combining all ways into one, data will be lost.

Best,
Tara

Hi,
By combining a roundabout into a full circle (way/432565972 ) you have affected destination_sign relations on it that are now incorrect. In the future please look out for all relations (destination_sign; turn_restrictions…) when combining/splitting ways.
Also, I am not sure that roundabouts in general should be merged. Some roundabouts have valuable lane information on ways that can be different depending on the change of lanes in one roundabout.

Best,
Tara

Hi,
I am not sure that all roundabouts should be merged into a single way just for the sake of bus routes going through them. Some roundabouts have valuable lane information on ways that can be different depending on the change of lanes in one roundabout.
Maybe a better solution would be just to add and arrange the previously split ways of roundabouts into a bus route relation rather than combining ways and potentially losing data?

Best,
Tara

Hi,
By combining a roundabout into full circle (way/721984805#map=19/-36.14047/144.72970 ) you have affected destination_sign relations on it that are now incorrect. In the future please look out for all relations (destination_sign; turn_restrictions…) when combining/splitting ways.
Also, I am not sure that all roundabouts should be merged just for the sake of routes going through them. Some roundabouts have valuable lane information on ways that can be different depending on the change of lanes in one roundabout.

Best,
Tara

Thanks for letting me know!
For some reason it did not download that link properly for the first time. I've deleted my edit from today so there are no double ways.

Kind regards,
Tara

Since the Snowy White River is a long one, I have drawn the multipolygon with several segments. In process of continuing and drawing the further segment I have forgotten to delete this way. It has been corrected. Thanks!

The name of the De Grey River was already placed on the waterway river. Since I was editing the riverbank of the same river it made since for the multipolygon of the riverbank to have the same name as the river itself.
But since I do not have the source to verify whether name of the river is actually correct I have removed the name tag from the relation so it would not cause any confusion. Thanks!

Thank you for letting me know. I have corrected the mistake.

Hi,
Based on government data, Mapillary imagery, and the classification of the roads nearby, should the classification of this road be secondary instead of primary? (Meandarra-Talwood Road and Meandarra-Condamine Road)

Kind regards,
Tara

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au