Hi, when editing in this changeset you've deleted a way that was a part of administrative boundary (relation/113179) and broke it. Could you please revert the change or fix East Oakdale boundary?

Thanks,
Tara

Hi, I've noticed you've been editing relation relation/6556221 but I've seen you've made so that ways (way/1175306831 and way/1175306830) are outer parts within residential polygon (way/251837046) that is marked as inner. Just wanted to ask whether these neighborhood ways were left as outer on purpose, so that they belong to the district, but the populated place as whole does not?
Thanks, Tara

Hi, I've noticed you've broken several administrative boundary relations (relation/5748011, relation/5748012 and relation/5748013 ). Can you tell me are you remapping admin_levels in this region and this is still a work in progress?
Thanks, Tara

Hi, I've noticed you've broken several administrative boundary relations (relation/6408624 , relation/5595089 and relation/5595088). Can you tell me are you remapping admin_levels in this region and this is still a work in progress?
Thanks, Tara

Hi, I've noticed you've broken several administrative boundary relations (relation/5574252 and relation/5574254) and that in a changeset a month ago, you've also removed their names. Can you tell me are you remapping admin_levels in this region and this is still a work in progress?
Thanks, Tara

The issue was that way (way/396950676) was excluded from relation so relation was incomplete. I've fixed it now.
Thanks, Tara

Hi, I've noticed there is an issue with relation (relation/10493722). It is broken in the same way as it was in your previous changeset (138647730). I've fixed it in changeset (138651516) but I see it is now broken again, in similar way as previously. Is there any special reason for this administrative boundary to have broken relation and such geometry? Are you still working on it or is this accidental error?
Thanks, Tara