Supaplex's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 120523735 | over 3 years ago | Hi, There is Taiwan Community highway tagging scheme, the provincial highway should be tagged as highway=primary
|
| 120491187 | over 3 years ago | way/275182190
|
| 120320053 | over 3 years ago | Why do you remove the footways?
|
| 120281782 | over 3 years ago | 重覆加了
|
| 120281797 | over 3 years ago | 重覆加了
|
| 120188173 | almost 4 years ago | Hi 台灣台鐵1067軌道軌距一般都不歸為窄軌吧
|
| 119999412 | almost 4 years ago | 可以用這個標籤
|
| 119932471 | almost 4 years ago | 不把市區段改成地下cable?以台灣狀況感覺應該是原地地下化
|
| 119943235 | almost 4 years ago | 不考慮用JOSM來加,會比較快一點
|
| 119797944 | almost 4 years ago | 醫院部分能用區域就用區域,而不用點,理想上是把醫院用地圈出來加上醫院的標籤
|
| 119733629 | almost 4 years ago | 另外也請加上來源,不然的話就會回退
|
| 119733629 | almost 4 years ago | 這應該是完全沒建成,而且也不應該連到台灣的鐵路系統 即便可以依照計劃書來畫,但標籤也下錯了,應該用 railway=proposed 才行
|
| 119645247 | almost 4 years ago |
Just as the relation note says, the collection relation should be neutral. The name field will be renamed using Mandarin, Vietnamese, whose claimed this area. The individual islands name field will remain in Mandarin tag, currently in China control Dennis Raylin Chen
|
| 119671510 | almost 4 years ago | 石牌一帶 |
| 119646058 | almost 4 years ago | |
| 119339558 | almost 4 years ago | According to the OpenStreetMap on the ground rules, OpenStreetMap treats territories according to whose in charge. In the Liancourt Rocks case, even though no permanent residents, there are tourist activities from South Korea, presenting control from South Korea. Stop changing the name of Liancourt Rocks, Data Working Group will have to take further action if you have further editing Dennis Raylin Chen
|
| 119345072 | almost 4 years ago | 還未實際建成的交通運輸路線可以用 life cycle 相關的標籤
例如:
請好好與其他不同意見的貢獻溝通,不然會需要請你暫時冷靜,請你回覆其他人的意見 Data Working Group
|
| 119373014 | almost 4 years ago | 還未實際建成的交通運輸路線可以用 life cycle 相關的標籤
例如:
請好好與其他不同意見的貢獻溝通,不然會需要請你暫時冷靜,請你回覆其他人的意見 Data Working Group
|
| 119476554 | almost 4 years ago | 您好: OpenStreetMap是群眾參與的共編地圖計劃,如果仍然是存在的事物,應當是修改現有的以符合比較精確的狀況,而非刪除用新的取代掉,也方便回饋過往的編輯歷史。
|
| 119513795 | almost 4 years ago | 您好: OpenStreetMap是群眾參與的共編地圖計劃,如果仍然是存在的事物,應當是修改現有的以符合比較精確的狀況,而非刪除用新的取代掉,也方便回饋過往的編輯歷史。
|