OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Supaplex's Comments

Changeset When Comment
68942542 about 5 years ago

The POI is in the building of the south, not this building.
88910288 about 5 years ago

編輯之後不要丟了不管，很多地方都已經有資料你還重覆編輯，像是台北市景明街、興隆路一段路口的行人穿越道。
94207325 about 5 years ago

應該是長方形的建築吧?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94207325

94022932 about 5 years ago

是這位人士回報的
note/765134
所以不知道是消失還是報錯位置
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94022932

93937159 about 5 years ago

node/7838197022/history
這個點以及附近幾個點直接就在馬路上了，geocoding 都很不準，你要手動移動嗎?
如果沒有的話，建議移除掉
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93937159

93937159 about 5 years ago

node/7838200927/history
太靠近馬路了，附近好幾個點都是這樣子，有資料品質的問題
TGOS轉的經緯度沒有對應到建築上面，你要手動移動到比較ok的位置，不處理的話就移除了
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93937159

93888741 about 5 years ago

平面停車場嗎？是否收費呢？
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93888741

93890714 about 5 years ago

請問這是測試資料嗎？
由於 OpenStreetMap 這套地理圖資資料庫被許多業者使用，不宜將測試性質的資料留在上面。
建議不要儲存，不要上傳測試資料。
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93890714

93903630 about 5 years ago

已經有台北大縱走的關係
relation/8727971
詳情請看 waymarktrail 網站
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=12.570000000000002!25.0823!121.6213
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93903630

93747467 about 5 years ago

可能改為花園比較好，公園比較是給人休憩與遊玩的地方，這裡是大路的三角地應該還是偏向景觀用途。
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93747467

93829228 about 5 years ago

已經有完整的臺灣城市的行政邊界，所以在OSM編輯上不會對每個道路加所在城市資訊。如果需要搜尋特定城市內的道路， 可以透過 Overpass API 指定地點搜尋道路。
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93829228

93769513 about 5 years ago

不畫出區域?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93769513

93174695 about 5 years ago

The hotel database by Taiwan tourism agency is open data compatible. So the question still remains is the tag should choose wisely. And of course the original mappers should response to the questions raise by the commenters.
93690545 about 5 years ago

地下47層？
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93690545

93616781 about 5 years ago

node/1996853625
The bus stop is already mapped
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93616781

93187056 about 5 years ago

I'll fix it.
Thanks
92944911 over 5 years ago

I think there is no device, but physically impossible to pass when you exceed the maxheight, and a sign says maxheight xx meters.
Most of maxheight warning does not need a device due to physically impossible to pass if you force to pass then your car will be stuck under the bridge.
93047556 over 5 years ago

看來一年前變刪掉了
node/289554109
已經補回來了
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93047556

92944911 over 5 years ago

Why do you remove max height relatuon
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92944911

92445725 over 5 years ago

你好：
名稱應該填寫站牌名稱，而非路線名或營運商
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92445725